IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v10y2008i6p400-407.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Potential biomass and logs from fire-hazard-reduction treatments in Southwest Oregon and Northern California

Author

Listed:
  • Barbour, R. James
  • Fried, Jeremy S.
  • Daugherty, Peter J.
  • Christensen, Glenn
  • Fight, Roger

Abstract

The FIA BioSum model was used to simulate three fire-hazard-reduction policies in an area comprising northern California, southwestern Oregon, and the east slopes of the Cascade Mountains in Oregon. The policy scenarios, all subject to a stand-scale fire-hazard-reduction effectiveness constraint, included maximize torching index improvement (Max TI), maximize net revenue recovery (Max NR), and minimize merchantable timber removal (Min Merch). Differences in the area treated under each scenario were considerable, ranging from 15 to 96% of the area for which effective treatments are technically feasible. For each scenario, weight, species, and source tree size of both dirty chips (hogfuel or biomass) and saw logs were estimated. The mix of species and sizes removed under each scenario was surprisingly similar, although the Min Merch scenario did remove more noncommercial species such as hardwoods and more saw logs in the midsize classes (10 to 16in. diameter at breast height (dbh); 25.4 to 40.6cm) than the other two scenarios. Saw logs accounted for 67 to 79% of the weight removed. Under all scenarios, the Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii)/larch (Larix) and white woods (Picea spp., Tsuga spp, and Abies spp.) species groups accounted for nearly all of the saw logs removed. Tops and limbs of commercial species and noncommercial species accounted for most of the dirty chips. Stems of low value commercial conifers (7 to 16in; 17.8 to 40.6cm) were also an important source of dirty chips. Trees smaller than 7in. (17.8cm) dbh were a relatively minor component of the dirty chip mix.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbour, R. James & Fried, Jeremy S. & Daugherty, Peter J. & Christensen, Glenn & Fight, Roger, 2008. "Potential biomass and logs from fire-hazard-reduction treatments in Southwest Oregon and Northern California," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 400-407, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:10:y:2008:i:6:p:400-407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389-9341(08)00009-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Prestemon, Jeffrey P. & Abt, Karen L. & Huggett Jr., Robert J., 2008. "Market impacts of a multiyear mechanical fuel treatment program in the U.S," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(6), pages 386-399, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ager, Alan A. & Vogler, Kevin C. & Day, Michelle A. & Bailey, John D., 2017. "Economic Opportunities and Trade-Offs in Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 226-239.
    2. Pokharel, Raju & Latta, Gregory S., 2020. "A network analysis to identify forest merchantability limitations across the United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    3. Crandall, Mindy S. & Adams, Darius M. & Montgomery, Claire A. & Smith, David, 2017. "The potential rural development impacts of utilizing non-merchantable forest biomass," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-29.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Crandall, Mindy S. & Adams, Darius M. & Montgomery, Claire A. & Smith, David, 2017. "The potential rural development impacts of utilizing non-merchantable forest biomass," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 20-29.
    2. Prestemon, Jeffrey P. & Abt, Karen L. & Barbour, R. James, 2012. "Quantifying the net economic benefits of mechanical wildfire hazard treatments on timberlands of the western United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 44-53.
    3. Becker, Dennis R. & Nechodom, Mark & Barnett, Adam & Mason, Tad & Lowell, Eini C. & Shelly, John & Graham, Dean, 2009. "Assessing the role of federal community assistance programs to develop biomass utilization capacity in the western United States," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 155-162, March.
    4. Korhonen, Jaana & Henderson, Jesse D. & Prestemon, Jeffrey, 2023. "National forest timber bids and export price interlinkages in the USA: The bounds testing approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    5. Miguel Riviere & Sylvain Caurla & Philippe Delacote, 2020. "Evolving Integrated Models From Narrower Economic Tools : the Example of Forest Sector Models," Post-Print hal-02512330, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:10:y:2008:i:6:p:400-407. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.