IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v14y1996i4p407-413.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Team syntegrity: A new methodology for group work

Author

Listed:
  • Leonard, Allenna

Abstract

Team Syntegrity is a new process, developed by management cybernetician Stafford Beer, for enabling groups to work together in a democratic, non-hierarchical fashion to capture their best thinking. It is a particularly appropriate process to use when groups are characterized by high levels of diversity - either because they come from different countries, such as the members of the European Community or NAFTA, or because they come from different political, cultural or disciplinary perspectives. This article describes how syntegrations look in action, the considerations which apply to their planning and delivery, and some avenues for future development and experimentation.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonard, Allenna, 1996. "Team syntegrity: A new methodology for group work," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(4), pages 407-413, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:14:y:1996:i:4:p:407-413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/026323739600028X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Martín‐Cruz & Víctor Martín‐Pérez & Jose Manuel Pérez‐Ríos & Iván Velasco‐Jiménez, 2014. "Team Syntegrity® as a Tool for Efficient Teamwork: An Experimental Evaluation in a Business Simulation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 215-226, March.
    2. Ana Gabriela Ramírez-Gutiérrez & Pedro Pablo Cardoso-Castro & Ricardo Tejeida-Padilla, 2021. "A Methodological Proposal for the Complementarity of the SSM and the VSM for the Analysis of Viability in Organizations," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 331-357, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:14:y:1996:i:4:p:407-413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.