IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eurman/v14y1996i1p69-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making organizational learning work: Consent and double linking between circles

Author

Listed:
  • Romme, Georges

Abstract

What kind of organizational structure best supports organizational learning? Focusing on this question, experiments in The Netherlands have led to the circular organization, in which learning processes in teams (circles) are effectively combined with the administrative hierarchy. The circle structure is used for policy making, whereas policy implementation remains within the domain of supervisors and managers. The circular model appears to provide a learning structure in which feedback rather than power is the key organizing principle.

Suggested Citation

  • Romme, Georges, 1996. "Making organizational learning work: Consent and double linking between circles," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 69-75, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:14:y:1996:i:1:p:69-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0263237395000488
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Claudia Vaderna & Robert Home & Paola Migliorini & Dirk Roep, 2022. "Overcoming divergence: managing expectations from organisers and members in community supported agriculture in Switzerland," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Romme, Abel, 1997. "Work, authority and participation : the scenario of circular organizing," Research Memorandum 001, Maastricht University, Netherlands Institute of Business Organization and Strategy Research (NIBOR).
    3. Geoffroy Douillé & Jean Vandewattyne & Agnès van Daele, 2015. "La sociocratie : des principes à la réalité de terrain dans un centre de recherche," Post-Print hal-01878334, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:eurman:v:14:y:1996:i:1:p:69-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/115/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.