Relationship between perceived improvement and treatment satisfaction among clients of a methadone maintenance program
AbstractPurpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between perceived improvement and client satisfaction in a methadone maintenance treatment population. A secondary objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Perceived Improvement Questionnaire (PIQ).Data sources/study setting Two hundred and thirty-two clients of a methadone maintenance treatment program filled out self-reported questionnaires and two open-ended questions measuring their perceived improvement and their level of satisfaction with the services received.Principal findings Correlation analyses revealed a significant relationship between participants' perceived improvement and their level of satisfaction with services received throughout their treatment. A factor analysis identified 3 sub-scales of the PIQ: emotional health, social relations and physical health. The PIQ's internal consistency and construct validity supported the adequacy of the metric properties of the questionnaire.Conclusion Further research is needed to investigate the link between clients' input and treatment satisfaction in different substance abuse populations. The scale's potential to provide valuable information such as clinical assessment and program evaluation should be explored.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Evaluation and Program Planning.
Volume (Year): 33 (2010)
Issue (Month): 4 (November)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan
Client satisfaction Perceived improvement Treatment outcome Methadone treatment;
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Larsen, Daniel L. & Attkisson, C. Clifford & Hargreaves, William A. & Nguyen, Tuan D., 1979. "Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 197-207, January.
- Garland, Ann F. & Saltzman, Marla D. & Aarons, Gregory A., 2000. "Adolescent satisfaction with mental health services: development of a multidimensional scale," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 165-175, May.
- Greenfield, Thomas K. & Attkisson, C. Clifford, 1989. "Steps toward a multifactorial satisfaction scale for primary care and mental health services," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 271-278, January.
- Perreault, Michel & Leichner, Pierre & sabourin, stephane & gendreau, pierre, 1993. "Patient satisfaction with outpatient psychiatric services : Qualitative and quantitative assessments," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 109-118.
- Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
- Tanner, Barry A., 1982. "A multi-dimensional client satisfaction instrument," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 5(2), pages 161-167, January.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.