IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v32y2009i2p119-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Staff and client perspectives on the Journey Mapping online evaluation tool in a drug court program

Author

Listed:
  • Crunkilton, Dhira D.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess staff and client perspectives on the Internet-based Journey Mapping program evaluation tool. A drug court program was chosen for a case study research design. Six staff and 10 clients participated in interviews and observations, and also responded to a questionnaire. A staff survey provided additional data. The study revealed evidence that (1) Journey Mapping was user-friendly, saved time, promoted positive thinking, facilitated communication, increased learning, and created client voice; (2) Journey Mapping, as a program evaluation tool, supported both administrative and treatment functions of the drug court; and (3) Journey Mapping's positive orientation supplied momentum for clients' treatment progress. Journey Mapping's distinctive technology offered a viable option for including narrative methods along with quantitative methods in program evaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Crunkilton, Dhira D., 2009. "Staff and client perspectives on the Journey Mapping online evaluation tool in a drug court program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 32(2), pages 119-128, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:32:y:2009:i:2:p:119-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(08)00109-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Trochim, William M. K. & Linton, Rhoda, 1986. "Conceptualization for planning and evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 289-308, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mackie, Joanna F. & Bjørke, Anne & Foti, Tara R. & Horwitz, Cynthia & Maddocks, Lisa C. & Marshall, Jennifer, 2019. "Journey mapping the Hillsborough County Early Childhood Court program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 57-62.
    2. James J. Chriss & Miyuki F. Tedor, 2023. "Improving Drug Courts: A Preliminary Study," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 28, pages 89-109, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. López-González, A. & Domenech, B. & Ferrer-Martí, L., 2018. "Formative evaluation of sustainability in rural electrification programs from a management perspective: A case study from Venezuela," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 95-109.
    2. Urban, Jennifer Brown & Hargraves, Monica & Trochim, William M., 2014. "Evolutionary Evaluation: Implications for evaluators, researchers, practitioners, funders and the evidence-based program mandate," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 127-139.
    3. Luis Miranda-Gumucio & Ignacio Gil-Pechuán & Daniel Palacios-Marqués, 2013. "An exploratory study of the determinants of switching and loyalty in prepaid cell phone users. An application of concept mapping," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 7(4), pages 603-622, December.
    4. Rosas, Scott R. & Ridings, John W., 2017. "The use of concept mapping in measurement development and evaluation: Application and future directions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 265-276.
    5. López-González, A. & Ferrer-Martí, L. & Domenech, B., 2019. "Sustainable rural electrification planning in developing countries: A proposal for electrification of isolated communities of Venezuela," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 327-338.
    6. Erin Lebow-Skelley & Sarah Yelton & Brandi Janssen & Esther Erdei & Melanie A. Pearson, 2020. "Identifying Issues and Priorities in Reporting Back Environmental Health Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Marta Roczniewska & Emma Hedberg Rundgren & Henna Hasson & Arnold B. Bakker & Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz, 2022. "How Should Job Crafting Interventions Be Implemented to Make Their Effects Last? Protocol for a Group Concept Mapping Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-10, October.
    8. Sage Kittelman & Javier Calvo‐Amodio, 2020. "A taxonomy of purposeful human activity system signs as a means to improving systems literacy," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 789-803, September.
    9. Ladinig, Thomas B. & Vastag, Gyula, 2021. "Mapping quality linkages based on tacit knowledge," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    10. C. Pons-Morera & L. Canós-Darós & I. Gil-Pechuan, 2018. "A model of collaborative innovation between local government and tourism operators," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 12(1), pages 143-168, March.
    11. Reavley, Nicola & Livingston, Jenni & Buchbinder, Rachelle & Bennell, Kim & Stecki, Chris & Osborne, Richard Harry, 2010. "A systematic grounded approach to the development of complex interventions: The Australian WorkHealth Program - Arthritis as a case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 342-350, February.
    12. Scott R. Rosas, 2017. "Group concept mapping methodology: toward an epistemology of group conceptualization, complexity, and emergence," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1403-1416, May.
    13. Trochim, William M., 2017. "Hindsight is 20/20: Reflections on the evolution of concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 176-185.
    14. McLinden, Daniel, 2017. "And then the internet happened: Thoughts on the future of concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 293-300.
    15. Donnelly, James P., 2017. "A systematic review of concept mapping dissertations," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 186-193.
    16. Trochim, William M. & McLinden, Daniel, 2017. "Introduction to a special issue on concept mapping," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 166-175.
    17. Mulaa, Josephine K. & Kilika, James M. & Namusonge, Mary J. & Institute of Research, Asian, 2021. "Conceptualizing Strategic Innovation in a Firm Context: A Theoretical Review and Research Agenda," OSF Preprints 8ckts, Center for Open Science.
    18. Inés Küster Boluda & Natalia Vila López & Vicente Castillo, 2010. "Efectos de los videojuegos en las marcas emplazadas: la transmisión de imagen a través de las emociones," Working Papers. Serie EC 2010-05, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    19. Brandon, Paul R., 1999. "Involving program stakeholders in reviews of evaluators' recommendations for program revisions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 363-372, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:32:y:2009:i:2:p:119-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.