IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v24y2001i3p287-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Outcome-asset impact model: linking outcomes and assets

Author

Listed:
  • Reed, C. S.
  • Brown, R. E.

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Reed, C. S. & Brown, R. E., 2001. "Outcome-asset impact model: linking outcomes and assets," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 287-295, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:24:y:2001:i:3:p:287-295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149-7189(01)00024-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian, David A. & Jones, Ann & Deyo, Diana, 1995. "Open systems evaluation and the logic model: Program planning and evaluation tools," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 333-341.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Schwerin, Michael J. & Michael, Paul G. & Glaser, Dale N. & Farrar, Kara L., 2002. "A cluster evaluation of Navy quality of life programs," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 303-312, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hart, Diane & Paucar-Caceres, Alberto, 2017. "A utilisation focussed and viable systems approach for evaluating technology supported learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 626-641.
    2. Julian, David A., 1997. "The utilization of the logic model as a system level planning and evaluation device," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 20(3), pages 251-257, August.
    3. Green, Rex S. & Ellis, Peter M. & Lee, Shirly S., 2005. "A city initiative to improve the quality of life for urban youth: how evaluation contributed to effective social programming," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 83-94.
    4. Reed, M.S. & Ferré, M. & Martin-Ortega, J. & Blanche, R. & Lawford-Rolfe, R. & Dallimer, M. & Holden, J., 2021. "Evaluating impact from research: A methodological framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(4).
    5. Entela Avdulaj, 2013. "Systemic Conceptual Framework in the Evaluation of Programs in Residential Services for Persons with Disabilities – Literature Review," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, October.
    6. Renger, Ralph & Hurley, Carolyn, 2006. "From theory to practice: Lessons learned in the application of the ATM approach to developing logic models," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 106-119, May.
    7. Ward Lyles & Philip Berke & Gavin Smith, 2016. "Local plan implementation: assessing conformance and influence of local plans in the United States," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(2), pages 381-400, March.
    8. Lenihan, Helena, 2011. "Enterprise policy evaluation: Is there a 'new' way of doing it?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 323-332, November.
    9. Nesman, Teresa M. & Batsche, Catherine & Hernandez, Mario, 2007. "Theory-based evaluation of a comprehensive Latino education initiative: An interactive evaluation approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 267-281, August.
    10. Gugiu, P. Cristian & Rodriguez-Campos, Liliana, 2007. "Semi-structured interview protocol for constructing logic models," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 339-350, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:24:y:2001:i:3:p:287-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.