Recent experience with the gasoline additive MTBE shows that regulations intended to improve environmental quality in one medium (e.g., air) may lead to unintended, and more serious, environmental consequences in another (e.g., water). The "cross-media pollution problem" refers to the unintended impacts in one environmental medium of environmental regulations implemented in another. We examine the potential for mechanism design to help regulators avoid unintended consequences of cross-media pollution in situations involving uncertain cross-media damages and asymmetric liability information between regulators and firms. In an empirical example, we consider the case of MTBE gasoline additive regulation in California.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.