IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v275y2019i3p1178-1189.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Merton’s portfolio problem including market frictions: A closed-form formula supporting the shadow price approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mariani, Francesca
  • Recchioni, Maria Cristina
  • Ciommi, Mariateresa

Abstract

This paper formulates a portfolio optimization in a friction market as a suitable stochastic control problem with hyperbolic absolute risk aversion utility functions under a specific functional form of the amount of wealth invested in the risky asset inspired by the Merton optimal dynamics. The state variable is the amount of wealth invested in the risky asset, while the control variable is the share rate. This formulation has two advantages. First, it provides a portfolio where the optimality is obtained by minimizing the probability of large changes in the portfolio composition with consequently low frictions, while allowing for an explicit solution to the optimal control problem. Second, with this formulation, it can be proven that this optimal solution is the optimal solution of the frictionless Merton problem for corrected price dynamics. The corrected dynamics shows that the market friction increases the risk premium by an additional term that is an elementary function of the risk associated with the market frictions, as well the price of the risk, which also depends on the risk aversion of the investor. In addition, the corrected dynamics supports the existence of a shadow price in friction markets as already shown in Kallsen and Muhle-Karbe (2010). Finally, an empirical analysis to assess the model performance is illustrated on five-minute data of four major traded stocks, three market indexes, and four exchange rates including the Bitcoin/USD rate.

Suggested Citation

  • Mariani, Francesca & Recchioni, Maria Cristina & Ciommi, Mariateresa, 2019. "Merton’s portfolio problem including market frictions: A closed-form formula supporting the shadow price approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(3), pages 1178-1189.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:275:y:2019:i:3:p:1178-1189
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221718310749
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.12.022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burton Hollifield & Robert A. Miller & Patrik Sandås, 2004. "Empirical Analysis of Limit Order Markets," Review of Economic Studies, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(4), pages 1027-1063.
    2. Longstaff, Francis A, 2001. "Optimal Portfolio Choice and the Valuation of Illiquid Securities," Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 407-431.
    3. Chen, An & Vellekoop, Michel, 2017. "Optimal investment and consumption when allowing terminal debt," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 385-397.
    4. Goll, Thomas & Kallsen, Jan, 2000. "Optimal portfolios for logarithmic utility," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 31-48, September.
    5. Nicolae Gârleanu & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2013. "Dynamic Trading with Predictable Returns and Transaction Costs," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 68(6), pages 2309-2340, December.
    6. Buckley, Winston & Long, Hongwei & Perera, Sandun, 2014. "A jump model for fads in asset prices under asymmetric information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 236(1), pages 200-208.
    7. Ismael Lemhadri, 2018. "Market Impact in a Latent Order Book," Papers 1802.06101, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    8. Ismael Lemhadri, 2018. "Market impact in a latent order book," Working Papers hal-01711192, HAL.
    9. Merton, Robert C., 1971. "Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 373-413, December.
    10. Ioannis Karatzas & John P. Lehoczky & Suresh P. Sethi & Steven E. Shreve, 1986. "Explicit Solution of a General Consumption/Investment Problem," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(2), pages 261-294, May.
    11. Umut Çetin & Robert A. Jarrow & Philip Protter, 2008. "Liquidity risk and arbitrage pricing theory," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Financial Derivatives Pricing Selected Works of Robert Jarrow, chapter 8, pages 153-183, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. M. H. A. Davis & A. R. Norman, 1990. "Portfolio Selection with Transaction Costs," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 676-713, November.
    13. Christoph Czichowsky & Walter Schachermayer & Junjian Yang, 2014. "Shadow prices for continuous processes," Papers 1408.6065, arXiv.org, revised May 2015.
    14. Umut Çetin & H. Soner & Nizar Touzi, 2010. "Option hedging for small investors under liquidity costs," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 317-341, September.
    15. Marín-Solano, Jesús & Navas, Jorge, 2010. "Consumption and portfolio rules for time-inconsistent investors," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(3), pages 860-872, March.
    16. J. Kallsen & J. Muhle-Karbe, 2010. "On using shadow prices in portfolio optimization with transaction costs," Papers 1010.4989, arXiv.org.
    17. Soner, H. Mete & Cetin, Umut & Touzi, Nizar, 2010. "Option hedging for small investors under liquidity costs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28992, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Sethi, Suresh P. & Taksar, Michael, 1988. "A note on Merton's "Optimum Consumption and Portfolio Rules in a continuous-Time Model"," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 395-401, December.
    19. Pierre‐André Chiappori & Monica Paiella, 2011. "Relative Risk Aversion Is Constant: Evidence From Panel Data," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 9(6), pages 1021-1052, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Feghhi Kashani , Mohammad & Mohebimajd , Ahmadreza, 2021. "Outperformance Testing of a Dynamic Assets Portfolio Selection Supplemented with a Continuous Paths Levy Process," Journal of Money and Economy, Monetary and Banking Research Institute, Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran, vol. 16(2), pages 253-282, June.
    2. Nikolay Khabarov & Alexey Smirnov & Michael Obersteiner, 2022. "Shadow prices and optimal cost in economic applications," Papers 2211.03591, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2022.
    3. Francesca Mariani & Gloria Polinesi & Maria Cristina Recchioni, 2022. "A tail-revisited Markowitz mean-variance approach and a portfolio network centrality," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 425-455, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerrard, Russell & Kyriakou, Ioannis & Nielsen, Jens Perch & Vodička, Peter, 2023. "On optimal constrained investment strategies for long-term savers in stochastic environments and probability hedging," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 948-962.
    2. Kyungsub Lee & Byoung Ki Seo, 2021. "Analytic formula for option margin with liquidity costs under dynamic delta hedging," Papers 2103.15302, arXiv.org.
    3. H. Mete Soner & Mirjana Vukelja, 2016. "Utility maximization in an illiquid market in continuous time," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 84(2), pages 285-321, October.
    4. Collin-Dufresne, Pierre & Daniel, Kent & Sağlam, Mehmet, 2020. "Liquidity regimes and optimal dynamic asset allocation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(2), pages 379-406.
    5. Olivier Guéant & Jiang Pu, 2015. "Option pricing and hedging with execution costs and market impact," Post-Print hal-01393124, HAL.
    6. Feyzullah Egriboyun & H. Soner, 2010. "Optimal investment strategies with a reallocation constraint," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 71(3), pages 551-585, June.
    7. Martin Herdegen & David Hobson & Joseph Jerome, 2020. "An elementary approach to the Merton problem," Papers 2006.05260, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2021.
    8. Olivier Gu'eant & Jiang Pu, 2013. "Option pricing and hedging with execution costs and market impact," Papers 1311.4342, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2015.
    9. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Michel Kschonnek & Rudi Zagst, 2022. "Portfolio optimization: not necessarily concave utility and constraints on wealth and allocation," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 95(1), pages 101-140, February.
    10. Xinfu Chen & Min Dai & Wei Jiang & Cong Qin, 2022. "Asymptotic analysis of long‐term investment with two illiquid and correlated assets," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(4), pages 1133-1169, October.
    11. Clarence Simard & Bruno Rémillard, 2019. "Pricing European Options in a Discrete Time Model for the Limit Order Book," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 985-1005, September.
    12. Baojun Bian & Xinfu Chen & Min Dai & Shuaijie Qian, 2021. "Penalty method for portfolio selection with capital gains tax," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1013-1055, July.
    13. Koichi Matsumoto, 2007. "Portfolio Insurance with Liquidity Risk," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 14(4), pages 363-386, December.
    14. Bruno Bouchard & G. Loeper & Y. Zou, 2017. "Hedging of covered options with linear market impact and gamma constraint," Post-Print hal-01611790, HAL.
    15. Panagiotis Christodoulou & Nils Detering & Thilo Meyer-Brandis, 2018. "Local Risk-Minimization With Multiple Assets Under Illiquidity With Applications In Energy Markets," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(04), pages 1-44, June.
    16. Peter Bank & Selim Gokay, 2013. "Superreplication when trading at market indifference prices," Papers 1310.3113, arXiv.org.
    17. Mei, Xiaoling & Nogales Martín, Francisco Javier, 2015. "Portfolio selection with proportional transaction costs and predictability," DES - Working Papers. Statistics and Econometrics. WS ws1521, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Estadística.
    18. Johannes Muhle-Karbe & Max Reppen & H. Mete Soner, 2016. "A Primer on Portfolio Choice with Small Transaction Costs," Papers 1612.01302, arXiv.org, revised May 2017.
    19. Frédéric Abergel & Grégoire Loeper, 2013. "Pricing and hedging contingent claims with liquidity costs and market impact," Working Papers hal-00802402, HAL.
    20. Vayanos, Dimitri & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Market Liquidity—Theory and Empirical Evidence ," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1289-1361, Elsevier.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:275:y:2019:i:3:p:1178-1189. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.