IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ejores/v213y2011i2p375-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Admission policies for the customized stochastic lot scheduling problem with strict due-dates

Author

Listed:
  • Germs, Remco
  • Van Foreest, Nicky D.

Abstract

This papers considers admission control and scheduling of customer orders in a production system that produces different items on a single machine. Customer orders drive the production and belong to product families, and have family dependent due-date, size, and reward. When production changes from one family to another a setup time is incurred. Moreover, if an order cannot be accepted, it is considered lost upon arrival. The problem is to find a policy that accepts/rejects and schedules orders such that long run profit is maximized. This problem finds its motivation in batch industries in which suppliers have to realize high machine utilization while delivery times should be short and reliable and the production environment is subject to long setup times. We model the joint admission control/scheduling problem as a Markov decision process (MDP) to gain insight into the optimal control of the production system and use the MDP to benchmark the performance of a simple heuristic acceptance/scheduling policy. Numerical results show that the heuristic performs very well compared with the optimal policy for a wide range of parameter settings, including product family asymmetries in arrival rate, order size, and order reward.

Suggested Citation

  • Germs, Remco & Van Foreest, Nicky D., 2011. "Admission policies for the customized stochastic lot scheduling problem with strict due-dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(2), pages 375-383, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:213:y:2011:i:2:p:375-383
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377221711002311
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonard Kleinrock & Hanoch Levy, 1988. "The Analysis of Random Polling Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 716-732, October.
    2. Martin I. Reiman & Lawrence M. Wein, 1998. "Dynamic Scheduling of a Two-Class Queue with Setups," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 532-547, August.
    3. Og[breve]uz, Ceyda & Sibel Salman, F. & Bilgintürk YalçIn, Zehra, 2010. "Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 200-211, May.
    4. David M. Markowitz & Lawrence M. Wein, 2001. "Heavy Traffic Analysis of Dynamic Cyclic Policies: A Unified Treatment of the Single Machine Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 246-270, April.
    5. Edie Schmidt & Maqbool Dada & James Ward & Duane Adams, 2001. "Using Cyclic Planning to Manage Capacity at ALCOA," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 16-27, June.
    6. Gutiérrez-Jarpa, Gabriel & Desaulniers, Guy & Laporte, Gilbert & Marianov, Vladimir, 2010. "A branch-and-price algorithm for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Deliveries, Selective Pickups and Time Windows," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(2), pages 341-349, October.
    7. Vandaele, Nico & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Cupers, Sascha, 2003. "Optimal grouping for a nuclear magnetic resonance scanner by means of an open queueing model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(1), pages 181-192, November.
    8. David M. Markowitz & Martin I. Reiman & Lawrence M. Wein, 2000. "The Stochastic Economic Lot Scheduling Problem: Heavy Traffic Analysis of Dynamic Cyclic Policies," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(1), pages 136-154, February.
    9. Winands, E.M.M. & Adan, I.J.B.F. & van Houtum, G.J., 2011. "The stochastic economic lot scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 1-9, April.
    10. VANDAELE, Nico & AN NIEUWENHUYSE, Inneke & CUPERS, Sascha, 2003. "Optimal grouping for a nuclear magnetic resonance scanner by means of an open queueing model," LIDAM Reprints CORE 1813, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chevalier, Philippe & Lamas, Alejandro & Lu, Liang & Mlinar, Tanja, 2015. "Revenue management for operations with urgent orders," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 476-487.
    2. Öner-Közen, Miray & Minner, Stefan, 2017. "Impact of priority sequencing decisions on on-time probability and expected tardiness of orders in make-to-order production systems with external due-dates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 524-539.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han Wu & Gerald Evans & Ki-Hwan Bae, 2016. "Production control in a complex production system using approximate dynamic programming," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2419-2432, April.
    2. Alexey Matveev & Varvara Feoktistova & Ksenia Bolshakova, 2016. "On Global Near Optimality of Special Periodic Protocols for Fluid Polling Systems with Setups," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 171(3), pages 1055-1070, December.
    3. Kris Lieckens & Nico Vandaele, 2016. "Differential evolution to solve the lot size problem in stochastic supply chain management systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 239-263, July.
    4. Otis B. Jennings, 2008. "Heavy-Traffic Limits of Queueing Networks with Polling Stations: Brownian Motion in a Wedge," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 12-35, February.
    5. Lopez de Haro, Santiago & Gershwin, Stanley B. & Rosenfield, Donald B., 2009. "Schedule evaluation in unstable manufacturing environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(1), pages 183-194, September.
    6. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Jalali, Zahra & Klassen, Kenneth J, 2017. "Outpatient appointment systems in healthcare: A review of optimization studies," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(1), pages 3-34.
    7. S. Creemers & M. Lambrecht & N. Vandaele, 2007. "Queueing Models in Healthcare," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(3), pages 471-498.
    8. David M. Markowitz & Lawrence M. Wein, 2001. "Heavy Traffic Analysis of Dynamic Cyclic Policies: A Unified Treatment of the Single Machine Scheduling Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(2), pages 246-270, April.
    9. Schütz, Hans-Jörg & Kolisch, Rainer, 2012. "Approximate dynamic programming for capacity allocation in the service industry," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(1), pages 239-250.
    10. I. Van Nieuwenhuyse, 2008. "Lot sizing in stochastic flowshops. Striking the balance between capacity and flow," Review of Business and Economic Literature, KU Leuven, Faculty of Economics and Business (FEB), Review of Business and Economic Literature, vol. 0(2), pages 147-160.
    11. Winands, E.M.M. & Adan, I.J.B.F. & van Houtum, G.J., 2011. "The stochastic economic lot scheduling problem: A survey," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 210(1), pages 1-9, April.
    12. Wei-Min Lan & Tava Lennon Olsen, 2006. "Multiproduct Systems with Both Setup Times and Costs: Fluid Bounds and Schedules," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(3), pages 505-522, June.
    13. Wang, Xiuli & Cheng, T.C.E., 2015. "A heuristic for scheduling jobs on two identical parallel machines with a machine availability constraint," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 74-82.
    14. Sigrún Andradóttir & Hayriye Ayhan & Douglas G. Down, 2001. "Server Assignment Policies for Maximizing the Steady-State Throughput of Finite Queueing Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(10), pages 1421-1439, October.
    15. Bertsimas, Dimitris., 1995. "The achievable region method in the optimal control of queueing systems : formulations, bounds and policies," Working papers 3837-95., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    16. Slotnick, Susan A., 2011. "Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 1-11, July.
    17. Wang, Xiuli & Xie, Xingzi & Cheng, T.C.E., 2013. "Order acceptance and scheduling in a two-machine flowshop," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 366-376.
    18. Marques, Alexandra & Soares, Ricardo & Santos, Maria João & Amorim, Pedro, 2020. "Integrated planning of inbound and outbound logistics with a Rich Vehicle Routing Problem with backhauls," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    19. Beemsterboer, Bart & Land, Martin & Teunter, Ruud, 2016. "Hybrid MTO-MTS production planning: An explorative study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 453-461.
    20. Kampf, M. & Kochel, P., 2006. "Simulation-based sequencing and lot size optimisation for a production-and-inventory system with multiple items," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(1), pages 191-200, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ejores:v:213:y:2011:i:2:p:375-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/eor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.