This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Popular support for progressive taxation

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Marhuenda, Francisco
Ortuno-Ortin, Ignacio

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6V84-3YVCYYK-H/2/5aa1d8c9c5fefcb2250fa0d2e3356f10
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Economics Letters.

Volume (Year): 48 (1995)
Issue (Month): 3-4 (June)
Pages: 319-324
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:eee:ecolet:v:48:y:1995:i:3-4:p:319-324

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Heidi Boesdal).

Related research
Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
  1. Francisco Marhuenda & Ignacio Ortuño-Ortín, 1995. "Majority voting and progressivity," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 19(3), pages 469-473, September. [Downloadable!]
  2. Benabou, Roland & Ok, Efe, 1997. "Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution : the POUM Hypothesis," IDEI Working Papers 78, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse, revised 1999. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  3. Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau, 2007. "A Positive Theory of Income Taxation," Departmental Working Papers 200706, Rutgers University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Carbonell, O. & Klor, E., 2000. "Representative Democracy and Marginal Rate Progressive Income Taxation," Working Papers 00-12, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University. [Downloadable!]
  5. Jenny de Freitas, 2009. "A probabilistic voting model of progressive taxation with incentive effects," Hacienda Pública Española, IEF, vol. 190(3), pages 9-26, September. [Downloadable!]
  6. DE DONDER, Philippe & HINDRIKS, Jean, 2003. "Majority support for progressive income taxation with corner preferences," CORE Discussion Papers 2003002, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  7. Oriol Carbonell-Nicolau & Efe Ok, 2004. "Multidimensional income taxation and electoral competition: an equilibrium analysis," Departmental Working Papers 200407, Rutgers University, Department of Economics. [Downloadable!]
  8. Francisco Marhuenda & Ignacio Ortuño Ortín, 1997. "-Income Taxation, Uncertaintly And Stability," Working Papers. Serie AD 1997-07, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? IDEAS also computes impact factors for journals and working paper series.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-7.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.