Adam Smith's answer to the Feldstein-Horioka Paradox: The invisible hand revisited
AbstractAdam Smith explained the Feldstein-Horioka Paradox, arguing that it is the pursuit of security that leads owners of capital to invest at home and that it is the pursuit of security, not profit, that leads them to promote the good of society.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Elsevier in its journal Economics Letters.
Volume (Year): 110 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolet
Feldstein-Horioka paradox or puzzle Capital mobility Capital flows Adam Smith Invisible hand;
Other versions of this item:
- Ayumu Yasutomi & Charles Yuji Horioka, 2010. "Adam Smith's Answer to the Feldstein-Horioka Paradox: The Invisible Hand Revisited," ISER Discussion Paper 0778, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Feldstein, Martin & Horioka, Charles, 1980.
"Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows,"
Royal Economic Society, vol. 90(358), pages 314-29, June.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.