IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v33y2011i6p991-998.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of crisis in family crisis intervention: Do crisis experience and crisis change matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Al, Channa M.W.
  • Stams, Geert Jan J.M.
  • van der Laan, Peter H.
  • Asscher, Jessica J.

Abstract

Evaluation studies of crisis intervention have focused on prevention of out-of-home placement of children or family functioning, but largely neglected the aspect of crisis. The present study examined crisis in 183 families receiving Family Crisis Intervention (FCI), addressing crisis characteristics and crisis change. In questionnaires children and parents were asked about their definition and experience of crisis and about their need for help. Results show that all families but one were in crisis at the beginning of the intervention, although the perception and extent of crisis differed among respondents. Crisis decreased from baseline to posttest according to clients and crisis intervention workers, but was not absent after the intervention. Combined with an unexpected pattern of reported family balance in the months before FCI, this result challenges the 4-6Â weeks time span assumption of a crisis period. Variations in perception of crisis, clients' need for help, and possible crisis patterns are discussed, addressing theoretical and practical implications for family crisis intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Al, Channa M.W. & Stams, Geert Jan J.M. & van der Laan, Peter H. & Asscher, Jessica J., 2011. "The role of crisis in family crisis intervention: Do crisis experience and crisis change matter?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 991-998, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:33:y:2011:i:6:p:991-998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(11)00020-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lewis, Robert E., 2005. "The effectiveness of Families First services: An experimental study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 499-509, May.
    2. Lindsey, Duncan & Martin, Sacha & Doh, Jenny, 2002. "The Failure of Intensive Casework Services to Reduce Foster Care Placements: An Examination of Family Preservation Studies," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(9-10), pages 743-775.
    3. Staudt, Marlys & Drake, Brett, 2002. "Intensive Family Preservation Services: Where's the Crisis?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(9-10), pages 777-795.
    4. Besharov, Douglas J., 1994. "Looking beyond 30, 60, and 90 days," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 16(5-6), pages 445-452.
    5. Campbell, Lynda, 2002. "Interagency Practice in Intensive Family Preservation Services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(9-10), pages 701-718.
    6. Staudt, Marlys & Drake, Brett, 2002. "Research on Services to Preserve Maltreating Families," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(9-10), pages 645-652.
    7. Bitonti, Christine, 2002. "Formative Evaluation in Family Preservation: Lessons from Nevada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 24(9-10), pages 653-672.
    8. Lietz, Cynthia A., 2009. "Examining families' perceptions of intensive in-home services: A mixed methods study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1337-1345, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evenboer, K.E. & Reijneveld, S.A. & Jansen, D.E.M.C., 2018. "Improving care for multiproblem families: Context-specific effectiveness of interventions?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 274-285.
    2. Tausendfreund, Tim & Knot-Dickscheit, Jana & Post, Wendy J. & Knorth, Erik J. & Grietens, Hans, 2014. "Outcomes of a coaching program for families with multiple problems in the Netherlands: A prospective study," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 203-212.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keegan Eamon, Mary & Kopels, Sandra, 2004. "`For reasons of poverty': court challenges to child welfare practices and mandated programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(9), pages 821-836, September.
    2. Millett, Lina Sapokaite & Ben-David, Vered & Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Echele, Greg & Moussette, Pam & Atkins, Valerie, 2016. "Understanding change among multi-problem families: Learnings from a formative program assessment," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 176-183.
    3. Simon, James David & Brooks, Devon, 2019. "Targeting services to reduce need after a child abuse investigation: Examining complex needs, matched services, and meaningful change," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 386-394.
    4. Littell, Julia H., 1997. "Effects of the duration, intensity, and breadth of family preservation services: A new analysis of data from the illinois family first experiment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(1-2), pages 17-39.
    5. Geen, Rob & Boots, Shelley Waters, 1999. "The potential effects of welfare reform on states' financing of child welfare services," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(9-10), pages 865-880.
    6. James, Sigrid, 2011. "What works in group care? -- A structured review of treatment models for group homes and residential care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 308-321, February.
    7. Jonson-Reid, Melissa & Chung, Sulki & Way, Ineke & Jolley, Jennifer, 2010. "Understanding service use and victim patterns associated with re-reports of alleged maltreatment perpetrators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 790-797, June.
    8. Ryan, Joseph P. & Schuerman, John R., 2004. "Matching family problems with specific family preservation services: a study of service effectiveness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 347-372, April.
    9. den Dunnen, Wendy & Stewart, Shannon L. & Currie, Melissa & Willits, Elizabeth & Baiden, Philip, 2013. "Predictors of out-of-home placement following residential treatment," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 518-524.
    10. Ayala-Nunes, Lara & Jiménez, Lucía & Hidalgo, Victoria & Jesus, Saul, 2014. "Family feedback in Child Welfare Services: A systematic review of measures," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 299-306.
    11. Vinnerljung, Bo & Sundell, Knut & Lofholm, Cecilia Andree & Humlesjo, Eva, 2006. "Former Stockholm child protection cases as young adults: Do outcomes differ between those that received services and those that did not?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 59-77, January.
    12. Rose, Susan J. & Meezan, William, 1995. "Child neglect: A study of the perceptions of mothers and child welfare workers," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 471-486.
    13. Visscher, L. & Jansen, D.E.M.C. & Scholte, R.H.J. & van Yperen, T.A. & Evenboer, K.E. & Reijneveld, S.A., 2022. "Elements of care that matter: Perspectives of families with multiple problems," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    14. Jonson-Reid, Melissa, 2011. "Disentangling system contact and services: A key pathway to evidence-based children's policy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 598-604, May.
    15. Eduard Vaquero & M. Àngels Balsells & Carmen Ponce & Aida Urrea & Alicia Navajas, 2020. "“If I’m Here, It’s Because I Do Not Have Anyone”: Social Support for the Biological Family during the Foster Care Process," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, March.
    16. Fuller, Tamara & Nieto, Martin, 2014. "Child welfare services and risk of child maltreatment rereports: Do services ameliorate initial risk?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(P1), pages 46-54.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:33:y:2011:i:6:p:991-998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.