IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/cysrev/v31y2009i2p185-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Toward best practice and innovation in independent living training: Experiences from the multi-site evaluation of federally-funded projects

Author

Listed:
  • Amodeo, Maryann
  • Collins, Mary E.
  • Clay, Cassandra

Abstract

This article describes a cluster of child welfare training projects focused on assisting foster youth with transition to independent living. The article examines the extent to which the projects used best practice principles and, in cases where best practices were lacking, the factors that impeded such practices. The article provides a picture of training practice in child welfare, identifying innovative activities and recommending ways that gaps can be filled to achieve better training outcomes. The sites conducted careful needs assessments, developed learning objectives based on competencies, did systematic curricula pilot testing, and presented state-of-the-art concepts. Recommendations include that sites conduct a more rigorous context analysis to understand challenges in transferring learning to the workplace, make more creative use of advisory committees, ensure that content experts/consultants are integrated into projects from the outset, focus more on skill development, and provide sufficient curriculum structure so that training can be repeated in a consistent way as well as adapted to meet varied learner needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Amodeo, Maryann & Collins, Mary E. & Clay, Cassandra, 2009. "Toward best practice and innovation in independent living training: Experiences from the multi-site evaluation of federally-funded projects," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 185-192, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:185-192
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0190-7409(08)00179-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:cysrev:v:31:y:2009:i:2:p:185-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/childyouth .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.