IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v71y2014icp107-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A combined likelihood ratio/information ratio bootstrap technique for estimating the number of components in finite mixtures

Author

Listed:
  • Polymenis, Athanase

Abstract

Modified MIR is a Monte-Carlo algorithm used for bootstrapping minimum information ratios in order to assess the number of unknown components in finite mixtures. The method was proposed as a modification of the minimum information ratio (MIR) method, and was proved to outperform it. Further simulations and a comparison with some other approaches confirm that the method works well for reasonable sample sizes. However, an important drawback which occurs with information ratio driven methods is that they do not allow for testing for the hypothesis of a single-component model. In order to overcome this problem, a combined method is proposed which consists of including a bootstrap likelihood ratio step and a modified MIR step into a single programming package. The bootstrap likelihood ratio methods show in general nice performances, so the combined method is also expected to be adequate for detecting single-component models. This, in turn, implies that the performance of the method is expected to be very similar to that of modified MIR in situations where the model is a true mixture. A simulation exercise is carried out, which confirms this feeling. This result is then in support of using the combined method rather than modified MIR for practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Polymenis, Athanase, 2014. "A combined likelihood ratio/information ratio bootstrap technique for estimating the number of components in finite mixtures," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 107-115.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:107-115
    DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.01.028
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167947313000431
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.csda.2013.01.028?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Polymenis, A. & Titterington, D. M., 1998. "On the determination of the number of components in a mixture," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 295-298, July.
    2. McLachlan, G. J. & Khan, N., 2004. "On a resampling approach for tests on the number of clusters with mixture model-based clustering of tissue samples," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 90-105, July.
    3. Surajit Ray & Bruce G. Lindsay, 2008. "Model selection in high dimensions: a quadratic‐risk‐based approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(1), pages 95-118, February.
    4. G. J. McLachlan, 1987. "On Bootstrapping the Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic for the Number of Components in a Normal Mixture," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 36(3), pages 318-324, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wong, Tony S.T. & Lam, Kwok Fai & Zhao, Victoria X., 2018. "Asymptotic null distribution of the modified likelihood ratio test for homogeneity in finite mixture models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 248-257.
    2. Wong, Tony Siu Tung & Li, Wai Keung, 2014. "Test for homogeneity in gamma mixture models using likelihood ratio," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 127-137.
    3. Fetene B. Tekle & Dereje W. Gudicha & Jeroen K. Vermunt, 2016. "Power analysis for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test for the number of classes in latent class models," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 10(2), pages 209-224, June.
    4. Fernández, D. & Arnold, R. & Pledger, S., 2016. "Mixture-based clustering for the ordered stereotype model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 46-75.
    5. Yuan Liu & Hongyun Liu, 2019. "Effects of Distance and Shape on the Estimation of the Piecewise Growth Mixture Model," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 36(3), pages 659-677, October.
    6. Park, Seong C. & Brorsen, B. Wade & Stoecker, Arthur L. & Hattey, Jeffory A., 2012. "Forage Response to Swine Effluent: A Cox Nonnested Test of Alternative Functional Forms Using a Fast Double Bootstrap," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 593-606, November.
    7. Meng Li & Sijia Xiang & Weixin Yao, 2016. "Robust estimation of the number of components for mixtures of linear regression models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1539-1555, December.
    8. Geert Soete & Willem Heiser, 1993. "A latent class unfolding model for analyzing single stimulus preference ratings," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 58(4), pages 545-565, December.
    9. Un Jung Lee & ShengLi Tzeng & Yu-Chuan Chen & James J Chen, 2017. "Development of Predictive Signatures for Treatment Selection in Precision Medicine," Biostatistics and Biometrics Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 83-88, August.
    10. Hennig, Christian, 2008. "Dissolution point and isolation robustness: Robustness criteria for general cluster analysis methods," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(6), pages 1154-1176, July.
    11. Kanchewa, Stella & Christensen, Kirsten M. & Poon, Cyanea Y.S. & Parnes, McKenna & Schwartz, Sarah, 2021. "More than fun and games? Understanding the role of school-based mentor-mentee match activity profiles in relationship processes and outcomes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    12. Michel Wedel & Wayne DeSarbo, 1995. "A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 12(1), pages 21-55, March.
    13. Derek S. Young & Xi Chen & Dilrukshi C. Hewage & Ricardo Nilo-Poyanco, 2019. "Finite mixture-of-gamma distributions: estimation, inference, and model-based clustering," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 13(4), pages 1053-1082, December.
    14. Marco Alfò & Giovanni Trovato, 2004. "Semiparametric Mixture Models for Multivariate Count Data, with Application," CEIS Research Paper 51, Tor Vergata University, CEIS.
    15. Dinghai Xu & John Knight, 2011. "Continuous Empirical Characteristic Function Estimation of Mixtures of Normal Parameters," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 25-50.
    16. A. Mooney, Jennifer & Helms, Peter J. & Jolliffe, Ian T., 2003. "Fitting mixtures of von Mises distributions: a case study involving sudden infant death syndrome," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 41(3-4), pages 505-513, January.
    17. Sebastian Vollmer & Hajo Holzmann & Florian Ketterer & Stephan Klasen & David Canning, 2013. "The Emergence of Three Human Development Clubs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(3), pages 1-7, March.
    18. Spiegel, Alisa & Slijper, Thomas & de Mey, Yann & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M. & Poortvliet, P. Marijn & Rommel, Jens & Hansson, Helena & Vigani, Mauro & Soriano, Bárbara & Wauters, Erwin & Appel, Franzisk, 2021. "Resilience capacities as perceived by European farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    19. Geert Soete & Wayne DeSarbo, 1991. "A latent class probit model for analyzing pick any/N data," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 8(1), pages 45-63, January.
    20. Woo, Mi-Ja & Sriram, T.N., 2007. "Robust estimation of mixture complexity for count data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4379-4392, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:71:y:2014:i:c:p:107-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.