Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

On the choice of the smoothing parameter for the BHEP goodness-of-fit test


Author Info

  • Tenreiro, Carlos
Registered author(s):


    The BHEP (Baringhaus-Henze-Epps-Pulley) test for assessing univariate and multivariate normality has shown itself to be a relevant test procedure, recommended in some recent comparative studies. It is well known that the finite sample behaviour of the BHEP goodness-of-fit test strongly depends on the choice of a smoothing parameter h. A theoretical and finite sample based description of the role played by the smoothing parameter in the detection of departures from the null hypothesis of normality is given. Additionally, the results of a Monte Carlo study are reported in order to propose an easy-to-use rule for choosing h. In the important multivariate case, and contrary to the usual choice of h, the BHEP test with the proposed smoothing parameter presents a comparatively good performance against a wide range of alternative distributions. In practice, if no relevant information about the tail of the alternatives is available, the use of this new bandwidth is strongly recommended. Otherwise, new choices of h which are suitable for short tailed and long tailed alternative distributions are also proposed.

    Download Info

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Bibliographic Info

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Computational Statistics & Data Analysis.

    Volume (Year): 53 (2009)
    Issue (Month): 4 (February)
    Pages: 1038-1053

    as in new window
    Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:4:p:1038-1053

    Contact details of provider:
    Web page:

    Related research



    References listed on IDEAS
    Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
    as in new window
    1. Henze, Norbert & Wagner, Thorsten, 1997. "A New Approach to the BHEP Tests for Multivariate Normality," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 1-23, July.
    2. L. Baringhaus & N. Henze, 1988. "A consistent test for multivariate normality based on the empirical characteristic function," Metrika, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 339-348, December.
    3. Gouriéroux, Christian & Tenreiro, Carlos, 2001. "Local Power Properties of Kernel Based Goodness of Fit Tests," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 161-190, August.
    4. Sándor Csörgő, 1989. "Consistency of some tests for multivariate normality," Metrika, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 107-116, December.
    5. Fang, Hong-Bin & Fang, Kai-Tai & Kotz, Samuel, 2002. "The Meta-elliptical Distributions with Given Marginals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Romeu, J. L. & Ozturk, A., 1993. "A Comparative Study of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Multivariate Normality," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 309-334, August.
    7. Henze, Norbert, 1997. "Extreme smoothing and testing for multivariate normality," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 203-213, October.
    8. Anderson, N. H. & Hall, P. & Titterington, D. M., 1994. "Two-Sample Test Statistics for Measuring Discrepancies Between Two Multivariate Probability Density Functions Using Kernel-Based Density Estimates," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(1), pages 41-54, July.
    9. Arcones, Miguel A. & Wang, Yishi, 2006. "Some new tests for normality based on U-processes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 76(1), pages 69-82, January.
    10. Fan, Yanqin, 1994. "Testing the Goodness of Fit of a Parametric Density Function by Kernel Method," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 10(02), pages 316-356, June.
    11. Coin, Daniele, 2008. "A goodness-of-fit test for normality based on polynomial regression," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 2185-2198, January.
    12. Fan, Yanqin, 1998. "Goodness-Of-Fit Tests Based On Kernel Density Estimators With Fixed Smoothing Parameters," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(05), pages 604-621, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as in new window

    Cited by:
    1. Zdeněk Hlávka & Marie Hušková & Claudia Kirch & Simos Meintanis, 2012. "Monitoring changes in the error distribution of autoregressive models based on Fourier methods," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 605-634, December.
    2. Tenreiro, Carlos, 2011. "An affine invariant multiple test procedure for assessing multivariate normality," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(5), pages 1980-1992, May.
    3. N. Balakrishnan & M. Brito & A. Quiroz, 2013. "On the goodness-of-fit procedure for normality based on the empirical characteristic function for ranked set sampling data," Metrika, Springer, vol. 76(2), pages 161-177, February.
    4. Meintanis, Simos G. & Tsionas, Efthimios, 2010. "Testing for the generalized normal-Laplace distribution with applications," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 3174-3180, December.


    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.


    Access and download statistics


    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2009:i:4:p:1038-1053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei).

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.