IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/csdana/v53y2008i1p196-208.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Two-level experiments for binary response data

Author

Listed:
  • Dorta-Guerra, Roberto
  • González-Dávila, Enrique
  • Ginebra, Josep

Abstract

Information in a statistical experiment is often measured through the determinant of its information matrix. Under first order normal linear models, the determinant of the information matrix of a two-level factorial experiment neither depends on where the experiment is centered, nor on how it is oriented, and balanced allocations are more informative than unbalanced ones with the same number of runs. In contrast, under binary response models, none of these properties hold. The performance of two-level experiments for binomial responses is explored by investigating the dependence of the determinant of their information matrix on their location, orientation, range, presence or absence of interactions and on the relative allocation of runs to support points, and in particular, on the type of fractionating involved. Conventional wisdom about two-level factorial experiments, which is deeply rooted on normal response models, does not apply to binomial models. In binary response settings, factorial experiments should not be used for screening or as building blocks for binary response surface exploration, and there is no alternative to the optimal design theory approach to planning experiments.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorta-Guerra, Roberto & González-Dávila, Enrique & Ginebra, Josep, 2008. "Two-level experiments for binary response data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 196-208, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2008:i:1:p:196-208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-9473(08)00347-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biedermann, Stefanie & Dette, Holger & Zhu, Wei, 2006. "Optimal Designs for DoseResponse Models With Restricted Design Spaces," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 747-759, June.
    2. Dror, Hovav A. & Steinberg, David M., 2008. "Sequential Experimental Designs for Generalized Linear Models," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 103, pages 288-298, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karvanen, Juha, 2009. "Approximate cost-efficient sequential designs for binary response models with application to switching measurements," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1167-1176, February.
    2. Belmiro P. M. Duarte & Guillaume Sagnol, 2020. "Approximate and exact optimal designs for $$2^k$$ 2 k factorial experiments for generalized linear models via second order cone programming," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 2737-2767, December.
    3. Elizabeth L. C. Merrall & Mandeep K. Dhami & Sheila M. Bird, 2010. "Exploring Methods to Investigate Sentencing Decisions," Evaluation Review, , vol. 34(3), pages 185-219, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karvanen, Juha, 2009. "Approximate cost-efficient sequential designs for binary response models with application to switching measurements," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 1167-1176, February.
    2. Niaparast, Mehrdad, 2009. "On optimal design for a Poisson regression model with random intercept," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 79(6), pages 741-747, March.
    3. Merton S. Krause, 2018. "Associational versus correlational research study design and data analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(6), pages 2691-2707, November.
    4. Dette, Holger & Holland-Letz, Tim, 2008. "A geometric characterization of c-optimal designs for heteroscedastic regression," Technical Reports 2008,26, Technische Universität Dortmund, Sonderforschungsbereich 475: Komplexitätsreduktion in multivariaten Datenstrukturen.
    5. McGree, J.M., 2017. "Developments of the total entropy utility function for the dual purpose of model discrimination and parameter estimation in Bayesian design," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 207-225.
    6. Nancy Flournoy & José Moler & Fernando Plo, 2020. "Performance Measures in Dose‐Finding Experiments," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 728-751, December.
    7. Drovandi, Christopher C. & McGree, James M. & Pettitt, Anthony N., 2013. "Sequential Monte Carlo for Bayesian sequentially designed experiments for discrete data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 320-335.
    8. Elizabeth L. C. Merrall & Mandeep K. Dhami & Sheila M. Bird, 2010. "Exploring Methods to Investigate Sentencing Decisions," Evaluation Review, , vol. 34(3), pages 185-219, June.
    9. repec:jss:jstsof:35:i06 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Belmiro P. M. Duarte & Guillaume Sagnol, 2020. "Approximate and exact optimal designs for $$2^k$$ 2 k factorial experiments for generalized linear models via second order cone programming," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 61(6), pages 2737-2767, December.
    11. Steven B Kim & Dong Sub Kim & Christina Magana-Ramirez, 2021. "Applications of statistical experimental designs to improve statistical inference in weed management," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, September.
    12. Martin Radloff & Rainer Schwabe, 2019. "Locally D-optimal designs for a wider class of non-linear models on the k-dimensional ball," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(2), pages 515-527, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:csdana:v:53:y:2008:i:1:p:196-208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/csda .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.