IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v130y2014icp532-542.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic evaluation of pre-combustion CO2-capture in IGCC power plants by porous ceramic membranes

Author

Listed:
  • Franz, Johannes
  • Maas, Pascal
  • Scherer, Viktor

Abstract

Pre-combustion-carbon-capture is one of the three main routes for the mitigation of CO2-emissions by fossil fueled power plants. Based on the data of a detailed technical evaluation of CO2-capture by porous ceramic membranes (CM) and ceramic membrane reactors (WGSMR) in an Integrated-Gasification-Combined-Cycle (IGCC) power plant this paper focuses on the economic effects of CO2-abatement. First the results of the process simulations are presented briefly. The analysis is based on a comparison with a reference IGCC without CO2-capture (dry syngas cooling, bituminous coal, efficiency of 47.4%). In addition, as a second reference, an IGCC process with CO2 removal based on standard Selexol-scrubbing is taken into account. The most promising technology for CO2-capture by membranes in IGCC applications is the combination of a water gas shift reactor and a H2-selective membrane into one water gas shift membrane reactor. For the WGSRM-case efficiency losses can be limited to about 6%-points (including losses for CO2 compression) for a CO2 separation degree of 90%. This is a severe reduction of the efficiency loss compared to Selexol (10.3% points) or IGCC–CM (8.6% points). The economic evaluation is based on a detailed analysis of investment and operational costs. Parameters like membrane costs and lifetime, costs of CO2-certificates and annual operating hours are taken into account. The purpose of these evaluations is to identify the minimum cost of electricity for the different capture cases for the variation of the boundary conditions. Fixing 90% CO2 separation the analysis identifies clearly that the economic minimum for cost of electricity and maximum thermodynamic efficiencies do not coincide. The cost of electricity for the reference case was 67€/MWh and for the WGSMR integration with 90% CO2 separation 57€/MWh, if certificate costs of 30€/tCO2, membrane costs of 300€/m2 and 8000 operating hours/year are considered. Further studies on the sensitivity of cost of electricity on the technical and commercial boundary conditions will be presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Franz, Johannes & Maas, Pascal & Scherer, Viktor, 2014. "Economic evaluation of pre-combustion CO2-capture in IGCC power plants by porous ceramic membranes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 532-542.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:130:y:2014:i:c:p:532-542
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914001573
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2011. "Thermodynamic analysis of air-blown gasification for IGCC applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(11), pages 3949-3958.
    2. Cormos, Calin-Cristian, 2012. "Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 434-445.
    3. Matthias Finkenrath, 2011. "Cost and Performance of Carbon Dioxide Capture from Power Generation," IEA Energy Papers 2011/5, OECD Publishing.
    4. Chen, Chao & Rubin, Edward S., 2009. "CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 915-924, March.
    5. Descamps, C. & Bouallou, C. & Kanniche, M., 2008. "Efficiency of an Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 874-881.
    6. Marvin B. Lieberman, 1984. "The Learning Curve and Pricing in the Chemical Processing Industries," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 15(2), pages 213-228, Summer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Horii, Shunsuke & Ohmura, Ryo, 2018. "Continuous separation of CO2 from a H2 + CO2 gas mixture using clathrate hydrate," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 78-84.
    2. Fu, Hongming & Xue, Kaili & Li, Zhaohao & Zhang, Heng & Gao, Dan & Chen, Haiping, 2023. "Study on the performance of CO2 capture from flue gas with ceramic and PTFE membrane contactors," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    3. Nicholas S. Siefert & Sarah Narburgh & Yang Chen, 2016. "Comprehensive Exergy Analysis of Three IGCC Power Plant Configurations with CO 2 Capture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-19, August.
    4. Wolfersdorf, Christian & Boblenz, Kristin & Pardemann, Robert & Meyer, Bernd, 2015. "Syngas-based annex concepts for chemical energy storage and improving flexibility of pulverized coal combustion power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 618-627.
    5. Chi, Changyun & Li, Yingjie & Zhang, Wan & Wang, Zeyan, 2019. "Synthesis of a hollow microtubular Ca/Al sorbent with high CO2 uptake by hard templating," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    6. Nimmanterdwong, Prathana & Chalermsinsuwan, Benjapon & Piumsomboon, Pornpote, 2017. "Emergy analysis of three alternative carbon dioxide capture processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 101-108.
    7. Kotowicz, Janusz & Michalski, Sebastian, 2016. "Thermodynamic and economic analysis of a supercritical and an ultracritical oxy-type power plant without and with waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 806-820.
    8. Fasahati, Peyman & Liu, J. Jay, 2015. "Economic, energy, and environmental impacts of alcohol dehydration technology on biofuel production from brown algae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P2), pages 2321-2336.
    9. Rosner, Fabian & Chen, Qin & Rao, Ashok & Samuelsen, Scott & Jayaraman, Ambal & Alptekin, Gokhan, 2019. "Thermo-economic analyses of IGCC power plants employing warm gas CO2 separation technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 541-553.
    10. Song, Chunfeng & Liu, Qingling & Ji, Na & Deng, Shuai & Zhao, Jun & Li, Yang & Kitamura, Yutaka, 2017. "Reducing the energy consumption of membrane-cryogenic hybrid CO2 capture by process optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 29-39.
    11. Xu, Qilong & Wang, Shuai & Luo, Kun & Mu, Yanfei & Pan, Lu & Fan, Jianren, 2023. "Process modelling and optimization of a 250 MW IGCC system: ASU optimization and thermodynamic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Trop, P. & Goricanec, D., 2016. "Comparisons between energy carriers' productions for exploiting renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 155-161.
    13. Sreedhar, I. & Vaidhiswaran, R. & Kamani, Bansi. M. & Venugopal, A., 2017. "Process and engineering trends in membrane based carbon capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 659-684.
    14. Boreum Lee & Seonju Jeong & Sunggeun Lee & Ho‐Young Jung & Shin‐Kun Ryi & Hankwon Lim, 2017. "Preliminary techno‐economic analysis of a multi‐bed series reactor as a simultaneous CF 4 abatement and utilization process," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(3), pages 542-549, June.
    15. Buonomenna, M.G. & Bae, J., 2015. "Membrane processes and renewable energies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1343-1398.
    16. Cheng, Jun & Wang, Yali & Liu, Niu & Hou, Wen & Zhou, Junhu, 2020. "Enhanced CO2 selectivity of mixed matrix membranes with carbonized Zn/Co zeolitic imidazolate frameworks," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    17. Janusz Kotowicz & Sebastian Michalski & Mateusz Brzęczek, 2019. "The Characteristics of a Modern Oxy-Fuel Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-34, September.
    18. Zheng, Yawen & Gao, Lin & Li, Sheng & Wang, Dan, 2022. "A comprehensive evaluation model for full-chain CCUS performance based on the analytic hierarchy process method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    19. David Berstad & Geir Skaugen & Simon Roussanaly & Rahul Anantharaman & Petter Nekså & Kristin Jordal & Stian Trædal & Truls Gundersen, 2022. "CO 2 Capture from IGCC by Low-Temperature Synthesis Gas Separation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Theo, Wai Lip & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Hashim, Haslenda & Mustaffa, Azizul Azri & Ho, Wai Shin, 2016. "Review of pre-combustion capture and ionic liquid in carbon capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1633-1663.
    21. Yan, Pei & Zheng, Chenghang & Zhu, Weizhuo & Xu, Xi & Gao, Xiang & Luo, Zhongyang & Ni, Mingjiang & Cen, Kefa, 2016. "An experimental study on the effects of temperature and pressure on negative corona discharge in high-temperature ESPs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 28-35.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Igor Donskoy, 2023. "Techno-Economic Efficiency Estimation of Promising Integrated Oxyfuel Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plants with Carbon Capture," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Prabu, V. & Geeta, K., 2015. "CO2 enhanced in-situ oxy-coal gasification based carbon-neutral conventional power generating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 672-683.
    3. Zhang, Jianyun & Zhou, Zhe & Ma, Linwei & Li, Zheng & Ni, Weidou, 2013. "Efficiency of wet feed IGCC (integrated gasification combined cycle) systems with coal–water slurry preheating vaporization technology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 137-145.
    4. Eide, Jan & de Sisternes, Fernando J. & Herzog, Howard J. & Webster, Mort D., 2014. "CO2 emission standards and investment in carbon capture," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 53-65.
    5. Nemet, Gregory F. & Baker, Erin & Jenni, Karen E., 2013. "Modeling the future costs of carbon capture using experts' elicited probabilities under policy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 218-228.
    6. Ammar Bany Ata & Peter Maximilian Seufert & Christian Heinze & Falah Alobaid & Bernd Epple, 2021. "Optimization of Integrated Gasification Combined-Cycle Power Plant for Polygeneration of Power and Chemicals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-24, November.
    7. Luis Puigjaner & Mar Pérez-Fortes & José M. Laínez-Aguirre, 2015. "Towards a Carbon-Neutral Energy Sector: Opportunities and Challenges of Coordinated Bioenergy Supply Chains-A PSE Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-48, June.
    8. Kim, Young Sik & Park, Sung Ku & Lee, Jong Jun & Kang, Do Won & Kim, Tong Seop, 2013. "Analysis of the impact of gas turbine modifications in integrated gasification combined cycle power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 977-986.
    9. Pettinau, Alberto & Ferrara, Francesca & Tola, Vittorio & Cau, Giorgio, 2017. "Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for CO2-free power generation from coal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 426-439.
    10. Giuffrida, Antonio & Romano, Matteo C. & Lozza, Giovanni, 2013. "Efficiency enhancement in IGCC power plants with air-blown gasification and hot gas clean-up," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 221-229.
    11. Lee, Woo-Sung & Lee, Jae-Cheol & Oh, Hyun-Taek & Baek, Seung-Won & Oh, Min & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2017. "Performance, economic and exergy analyses of carbon capture processes for a 300 MW class integrated gasification combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 731-742.
    12. Chen, Qun & Xu, Yun-Chao & Hao, Jun-Hong, 2014. "An optimization method for gas refrigeration cycle based on the combination of both thermodynamics and entransy theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 982-989.
    13. Mansouri Majoumerd, Mohammad & Raas, Han & De, Sudipta & Assadi, Mohsen, 2014. "Estimation of performance variation of future generation IGCC with coal quality and gasification process – Simulation results of EU H2-IGCC project," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 452-462.
    14. Park, Sung Ho & Lee, Seung Jong & Lee, Jin Wook & Chun, Sung Nam & Lee, Jung Bin, 2015. "The quantitative evaluation of two-stage pre-combustion CO2 capture processes using the physical solvents with various design parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 47-55.
    15. Xu, Qilong & Wang, Shuai & Luo, Kun & Mu, Yanfei & Pan, Lu & Fan, Jianren, 2023. "Process modelling and optimization of a 250 MW IGCC system: Model setup, validation, and preliminary predictions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    16. Tola, Vittorio & Pettinau, Alberto, 2014. "Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1461-1474.
    17. Cao, Yang & He, Boshu & Ding, Guangchao & Su, Liangbin & Duan, Zhipeng, 2017. "Energy and exergy investigation on two improved IGCC power plants with different CO2 capture schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 47-57.
    18. Oh, Hyun-Taek & Lee, Woo-Sung & Ju, Youngsan & Lee, Chang-Ha, 2019. "Performance evaluation and carbon assessment of IGCC power plant with coal quality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    19. Cocco, Daniele & Serra, Fabio & Tola, Vittorio, 2013. "Assessment of energy and economic benefits arising from syngas storage in IGCC power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 635-643.
    20. Verma, Aman & Kumar, Amit, 2015. "Life cycle assessment of hydrogen production from underground coal gasification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 556-568.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:130:y:2014:i:c:p:532-542. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.