IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v122y2014icp17-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of continuous feedback on households’ electricity consumption: Potentials and barriers

Author

Listed:
  • Nilsson, Andreas
  • Bergstad, Cecilia Jakobsson
  • Thuvander, Liane
  • Andersson, David
  • Andersson, Kristin
  • Meiling, Pär

Abstract

Two field experiments were carried out to study (a) the effects on energy savings of continuous visual feedback via in-home displays, and (b) the motives for responding or not. In study 1, 40 participants living in separate or semi-detached houses in two different towns participated. All participants received a questionnaire and a list of possible energy saving measures. Households were then randomly assigned to an experimental condition (display) or a control condition (no display). In study 2, 32 households in rented apartments participated. No significant differences between the conditions were found for either of the studies. In study 2, semi-structured interviews were conducted among nine of the households. Through an analysis of interview transcripts barriers were identified explaining why the feedback intervention was not sufficient to change behaviour and reduce consumption. The barriers experienced indicate that there is a risk of overconfidence in IHDs. For the development of energy policies and more wide-scale implementation, it is important to be aware of the potential obstacles to success.

Suggested Citation

  • Nilsson, Andreas & Bergstad, Cecilia Jakobsson & Thuvander, Liane & Andersson, David & Andersson, Kristin & Meiling, Pär, 2014. "Effects of continuous feedback on households’ electricity consumption: Potentials and barriers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 17-23.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:122:y:2014:i:c:p:17-23
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.060
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261914000890
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.060?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hargreaves, Tom & Nye, Michael & Burgess, Jacquelin, 2010. "Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6111-6119, October.
    2. Ellegård, Kajsa & Palm, Jenny, 2011. "Visualizing energy consumption activities as a tool for making everyday life more sustainable," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(5), pages 1920-1926, May.
    3. Vassileva, Iana & Wallin, Fredrik & Dahlquist, Erik, 2012. "Analytical comparison between electricity consumption and behavioral characteristics of Swedish households in rented apartments," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 182-188.
    4. Vassileva, Iana & Dahlquist, Erik & Wallin, Fredrik & Campillo, Javier, 2013. "Energy consumption feedback devices’ impact evaluation on domestic energy use," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 314-320.
    5. Vassileva, Iana & Odlare, Monica & Wallin, Fredrik & Dahlquist, Erik, 2012. "The impact of consumers’ feedback preferences on domestic electricity consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 575-582.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhou, Kaile & Yang, Shanlin, 2016. "Understanding household energy consumption behavior: The contribution of energy big data analytics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 810-819.
    2. Pothitou, Mary & Hanna, Richard F. & Chalvatzis, Konstantinos J., 2016. "Environmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviour and energy savings in households: An empirical study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1217-1229.
    3. Kendel, Adnane & Lazaric, Nathalie & Maréchal, Kevin, 2017. "What do people ‘learn by looking’ at direct feedback on their energy consumption? Results of a field study in Southern France," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 593-605.
    4. Vassileva, Iana & Campillo, Javier, 2014. "Increasing energy efficiency in low-income households through targeting awareness and behavioral change," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 59-63.
    5. Khosrowpour, Ardalan & Jain, Rishee K. & Taylor, John E. & Peschiera, Gabriel & Chen, Jiayu & Gulbinas, Rimas, 2018. "A review of occupant energy feedback research: Opportunities for methodological fusion at the intersection of experimentation, analytics, surveys and simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 304-316.
    6. Vassileva, Iana & Dahlquist, Erik & Wallin, Fredrik & Campillo, Javier, 2013. "Energy consumption feedback devices’ impact evaluation on domestic energy use," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 314-320.
    7. Chatzigeorgiou, I.M. & Andreou, G.T., 2021. "A systematic review on feedback research for residential energy behavior change through mobile and web interfaces," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    8. Komatsu, Hidenori & Nishio, Ken-ichiro, 2015. "An experimental study on motivational change for electricity conservation by normative messages," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 35-43.
    9. Walter Salas-Zapata & Anny Posada-Castaño & Diana Mejía-Durango, 2021. "An explanation of the behavioral origin of moderation in the use of natural resources: a meta-synthesis study," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 487-500, December.
    10. Khosrowpour, Ardalan & Xie, Yimeng & Taylor, John E. & Hong, Yili, 2016. "One size does not fit all: Establishing the need for targeted eco-feedback," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 523-530.
    11. Fettermann, Diego Castro & Cavalcante, Caroline Gobbo Sá & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Avalone, Marianne Costa, 2020. "Configuration of a smart meter for Brazilian customers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    12. Chalal, M.L. & Medjdoub, B. & Bezai, N. & Bull, R. & Zune, M., 2022. "Visualisation in energy eco-feedback systems: A systematic review of good practice," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    13. Belaïd, Fateh & Youssef, Adel Ben & Lazaric, Nathalie, 2020. "Scrutinizing the direct rebound effect for French households using quantile regression and data from an original survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    14. Kajsa Ellegård & Jenny Palm, 2015. "Who Is Behaving? Consequences for Energy Policy of Concept Confusion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Krishnamurti, Tamar & Davis, Alexander L. & Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle & Wang, Jack & Canfield, Casey, 2013. "Creating an in-home display: Experimental evidence and guidelines for design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 448-458.
    16. Buckley, Penelope, 2020. "Prices, information and nudges for residential electricity conservation: A meta-analysis," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Vassileva, Iana & Wallin, Fredrik & Dahlquist, Erik, 2012. "Understanding energy consumption behavior for future demand response strategy development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 94-100.
    18. Ahmadi-Karvigh, Simin & Ghahramani, Ali & Becerik-Gerber, Burcin & Soibelman, Lucio, 2018. "Real-time activity recognition for energy efficiency in buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 146-160.
    19. Anders Dalén & Jan Krämer, 2017. "Towards a User-Centered Feedback Design for Smart Meter Interfaces to Support Efficient Energy-Use Choices," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(5), pages 361-373, October.
    20. Zyadin, Anas & Puhakka, Antero & Halder, Pradipta & Ahponen, Pirkkoliisa & Pelkonen, Paavo, 2014. "The relative importance of home, school, and traditional mass media sources in elevating youth energy awareness," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 409-416.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:122:y:2014:i:c:p:17-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.