IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v97y2010i10p1469-1476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of transient subsurface waterlogging on root growth, plant biomass and yield of chickpea

Author

Listed:
  • Palta, J.A.
  • Ganjeali, A.
  • Turner, N.C.
  • Siddique, K.H.M.

Abstract

Root growth and proliferation are important for achieving the yield potential of chickpea in soils prone to waterlogging. Root growth characteristics and seed yield of the desi cultivar Rupali and the kabuli cultivar Almaz that differ in seed size and early vigour were investigated under well-drained and transiently-waterlogged conditions in glass-walled root boxes in a controlled-temperature glasshouse. Rooting parameters and detailed measurements of root growth and proliferation were made at 2-day intervals using a root mapping technique and by sampling the roots from the soil 14 days after the transient waterlogging ended. Although the roots of the kabuli cultivar Almaz had greater dry matter and length than the desi cultivar Rupali, the subsurface waterlogging promptly stopped the root growth of both genotypes. Root dry matter in both types of chickpea was reduced by two-thirds, 14 days after the cessation of the 12-day waterlogging treatment. The reduction resulted from an inhibition in root growth and proliferation, which led to a lower root length density down the soil profile, particularly in the top 0.6Â m of the waterlogged plants. While root length and root dry matter was higher in the kabuli cultivar Almaz than in the desi cultivar Rupali after waterlogging, they were not associated with a greater above-ground dry matter or seed yield at maturity. The transient waterlogging reduced the seed yield by 54% in the kabuli cultivar Almaz and by 44% in the desi cultivar Rupali. The reduction in seed yield in the kabuli cultivar Almaz resulted from 50% decline in the number of seeds per pod while in the desi cultivar Rupali it was a consequence of less pods and seeds per pod. Subsurface waterlogging changed the rooting pattern in chickpea, inhibiting root branching and the growth of the tap root and severely reducing the growth of root branches. The release from the waterlogging induced the production of new roots rather than regrowth of existing roots.

Suggested Citation

  • Palta, J.A. & Ganjeali, A. & Turner, N.C. & Siddique, K.H.M., 2010. "Effects of transient subsurface waterlogging on root growth, plant biomass and yield of chickpea," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(10), pages 1469-1476, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:10:p:1469-1476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378-3774(10)00155-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhang, Wenchao & Zhu, Jianqiang & Zhou, Xinguo & Li, Fahu, 2018. "Effects of shallow groundwater table and fertilization level on soil physico-chemical properties, enzyme activities, and winter wheat yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 307-317.
    2. Nandi, R. & Mukherjee, S. & Bandyopadhyay, P.K. & Saha, M. & Singh, K.C. & Ghatak, P. & Kundu, A. & Saha, S. & Nath, R. & Chakraborti, P., 2023. "Assessment and mitigation of soil water stress of rainfed lentil (Lens culinaries Medik) through sowing time, tillage and potassic fertilization disparities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    3. Siddique, S.T. & Kamruzzaman, M. & Sharna, S.C., 2020. "Comparative analysis of chickpea with boro rice in drought-prone areas of Bangladesh," International Journal of Agricultural Research, Innovation and Technology (IJARIT), IJARIT Research Foundation, vol. 10(2), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:97:y:2010:i:10:p:1469-1476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.