Nesme, Thomas Lescourret, Françoise Bellon, Stéphane Habib, Robert
Abstract
Modelling can be a powerful tool to help us understand and evaluate farmers' practices. It can provide us with references that can then be compared to farmers' practices. We applied this type of modelling approach in order to understand and to evaluate N fertilisation in apple orchards. We used Epistics, an agronomic model that simulates the N and water dynamics in apple orchards and that generates N fertilisation schedules by using a supply demand approach over fixed planning horizons. A schedule is characterised by a total N amount and an application timing. These types of model-generated schedules were evaluated on nitrate leaching and fulfilment of crop N requirements. Schedule generation was performed with different weightings of these two objectives. Farmers' practices were compared to fertilisation schedules generated by Epistics, either with user-defined or with optimised parameters of schedule generation. Model analysis showed that not taking environmental risks into account led to considerable over-fertilisation (e.g., mean of 141Â kg N/ha/yr for year 2003 for all plots) with high leaching. With limited consideration of environmental risks, a sharp decrease of the model-generated total N amount to be applied per ha and per year was observed (e.g., mean of 57Â kg N/ha/yr for year 2003 for all plots) without restricting fulfilment of N requirements. Farmers' fertilisation practices were similar to those generated by the model that took limited environmental risks into account. They corresponded, on average, to a moderate over-fertilisation, aimed at fulfilling about twice the crop N requirements. For a given total N amount to be applied per ha and per year, the farmers' different fertilisation timing did not influence N leaching or the fulfilment of crop N requirements. Although the variability of total N amounts applied by farmers is partly unexplained, this approach, which combines the analysis and evaluation of farmers' practices, contributed to understanding and improving farmers' fertilisation practices.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 99 (2009) Issue (Month): 2-3 (February) Pages: 76-85 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML
(with abstract),
plain text
(with abstract),
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite),
ReDIF