IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v100y2009i1-3p43-50.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Adaptive management of stocking rates to reduce effects of drought on cow-calf production systems in semi-arid rangelands

Author

Listed:
  • Díaz-Solís, H.
  • Grant, W.E.
  • Kothmann, M.M.
  • Teague, W.R.
  • Díaz-García, J.A.

Abstract

We used simple ecological sustainability simulator (SESS) [Díaz-Solís, H., Kothmann, M.M., Hamilton, W.T., Grant, W.E., 2003. A simple ecological sustainability simulator (SESS) for stocking rate management on semi-arid grazinglands. Agric. Syst. 76, 655-680. ], modified to represent each of five management strategies (sets of decision rules) for adjusting stocking rates, to identify strategies that could reduce effects of drought on cow-calf production systems in semi-arid rangelands. We parameterized the model to represent a region of extensive cow-calf production in the northeastern portion of the Mexican state of Coahuila, and evaluated animal performance (animal body condition, cow mortality, and calf production) and range condition resulting from each strategy under random precipitation conditions typical of the region. To evaluate the validity of the randomly generated precipitation, we conducted the simulations under an historical (1950-1994) precipitation regime. The five management strategies included one with no adjustments to stocking rate (CONTROL, most common current practice), one with stocking rate adjustment rules based on changes in animal body condition (BCS), and three with different stocking rate adjustment rules based on various comparisons of recent-year precipitation with long-term mean precipitation during the growing season (March-November) (REPLA, PPT 1Y, PPT 2Y). Each strategy was evaluated at each of three initial base-level stock cow stocking rates (125, 250 and 500 AUY · 5000 ha-1). Stocking rate adjustments consisted of partial or total de-stocking, with the re-establishment, or not, of the initial number of stock cows before the beginning of the subsequent breeding season. Results of 45-year simulations under both random and historical precipitation suggest CONTROL and PPT 2Y (based on comparison of current year and previous year precipitation with the long-term mean) strategies, combined with the high base-level stocking rate, are the worst and best, respectively. Under the historical precipitation regime, in the last period of time simulated (1980-1994) these two strategies resulted, respectively, in poor (0.5) versus good range condition (1.0), animal body condition scores of 2.6 versus 5.2, annual cow mortalities of 76 versus 5%, and calf production rates of 0.9 versus 10.6 kg ha-1 year-1 at weaning. The PPT 1Y strategy (based on comparison of current year precipitation with the long-term mean) produced results fairly similar to PPT 2Y, with BCS and REPLA strategies producing results intermediate between CONTROL and PPT 2Y. Our results suggest it is advantageous to adjust stocking rates based on precipitation during the current growing season since it improves cattle production without damaging range condition. Considering the practical feasibility of the strategies, we recommend the PPT 1Y strategy because it maintains range condition at moderate stocking rates, results in good animal performance and does not require total de-stocking of the ranch. The simple method we developed to stochastically generate monthly precipitation produces a time series of precipitation values that were representative of general historical precipitation patterns and provided realistic levels of uncertainty in simulated forage production to evaluate alternative management strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Díaz-Solís, H. & Grant, W.E. & Kothmann, M.M. & Teague, W.R. & Díaz-García, J.A., 2009. "Adaptive management of stocking rates to reduce effects of drought on cow-calf production systems in semi-arid rangelands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 100(1-3), pages 43-50, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:100:y:2009:i:1-3:p:43-50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308-521X(08)00138-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Illius, A. W. & Derry, J. F. & Gordon, I. J., 1998. "Evaluation of strategies for tracking climatic variation in semi-arid grazing systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 381-398, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prost, Lorène & Reau, Raymond & Paravano, Laurette & Cerf, Marianne & Jeuffroy, Marie-Hélène, 2018. "Designing agricultural systems from invention to implementation: the contribution of agronomy. Lessons from a case study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 122-132.
    2. Rhoda F. Aderinto & J. Alfonso Ortega-S. & Ambrose O. Anoruo & Richard Machen & Benjamin L. Turner, 2020. "Can the Tragedy of the Commons be Avoided in Common-Pool Forage Resource Systems? An Application to Small-Holder Herding in the Semi-Arid Grazing Lands of Nigeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Pacín, Fernando & Oesterheld, Martín, 2014. "In-farm diversity stabilizes return on capital in Argentine agro-ecosystems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 51-59.
    4. Ravjit Khangura & David Ferris & Cameron Wagg & Jamie Bowyer, 2023. "Regenerative Agriculture—A Literature Review on the Practices and Mechanisms Used to Improve Soil Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, January.
    5. Nasca, J.A. & Feldkamp, C.R. & Arroquy, J.I. & Colombatto, D., 2015. "Efficiency and stability in subtropical beef cattle grazing systems in the northwest of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-96.
    6. Irisarri, J.G.N. & Oesterheld, M., 2020. "Temporal variation of stocking rate and primary production in the face of drought and land use change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Wang, Tong & Park, Seong C. & Bevers, Stan & Teague, Richard & Cho, Jaesung, 2013. "Factors Affecting Cow-Calf Herd Performance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 38(3), pages 1-22.
    8. Iglesias, Eva & Báez, Karen & Diaz-Ambrona, Carlos H., 2016. "Assessing drought risk in Mediterranean Dehesa grazing lands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 65-74.
    9. Tinsley, Ty L. & Chumbley, Steven & Mathis, Clay & Machen, Richard & Turner, Benjamin L., 2019. "Managing cow herd dynamics in environments of limited forage productivity and livestock marketing channels: An application to semi-arid Pacific island beef production using system dynamics," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 78-93.
    10. Gutiérrez, Francisco & Gallego, Federico & Paruelo, José M. & Rodríguez, Claudia, 2020. "Damping and lag effects of precipitation variability across trophic levels in Uruguayan rangelands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Campbell, Bruce M. & Gordon, Iain J. & Luckert, Martin K. & Petheram, Lisa & Vetter, Susanne, 2006. "In search of optimal stocking regimes in semi-arid grazing lands: One size does not fit all," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 75-85, November.
    2. Irisarri, J.G.N. & Oesterheld, M., 2020. "Temporal variation of stocking rate and primary production in the face of drought and land use change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Angassa, Ayana & Oba, Gufu, 2007. "Relating long-term rainfall variability to cattle population dynamics in communal rangelands and a government ranch in southern Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 715-725, June.
    4. Diaz-Solis, H. & Kothmann, M. M. & Hamilton, W. T. & Grant, W. E., 2003. "A simple ecological sustainability simulator (SESS) for stocking rate management on semi-arid grazinglands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 655-680, May.
    5. Illius, A. W. & Derry, J. F. & Gordon, I. J., 2000. "Evaluation of strategies for tracking climatic variation in semi-arid grazing systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 73-74, January.
    6. Asseng, Senthold & Thomas, Dean & McIntosh, Peter & Alves, Oscar & Khimashia, Nirav, 2012. "Managing mixed wheat–sheep farms with a seasonal forecast," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 50-56.
    7. Higgins, Steven I. & Kantelhardt, Jochen & Scheiter, Simon & Boerner, Jan, 2007. "Sustainable management of extensively managed savanna rangelands," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 102-114, April.
    8. Diaz-Solis, H. & Kothmann, M.M. & Grant, W.E. & De Luna-Villarreal, R., 2006. "Application of a simple ecological sustainability simulator (SESS) as a management tool in the semi-arid rangelands of northeastern Mexico," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 88(2-3), pages 514-527, June.
    9. Hahn, B. D. & Richardson, F. D. & Starfield, A. M., 1999. "Frame-based modelling as a method of simulating rangeland production systems in the long term," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 29-49, October.
    10. Richardson, F.D. & Hahn, B.D., 2007. "A short-term mechanistic model of forage and livestock in the semi-arid Succulent Karoo: 2. Evaluation and application," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 95(1-3), pages 62-75, December.
    11. Campbell, B. M. & Dore, D. & Luckert, M. & Mukamuri, B. & Gambiza, J., 2000. "SPECIAL SECTION: LAND USE OPTIONS IN DRY TROPICAL WOODLAND ECOSYSTEMS IN ZIMBABWE: Economic comparisons of livestock production in communal grazing lands in Zimbabwe," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 413-438, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:100:y:2009:i:1-3:p:43-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.