IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ect/emjrnl/v3y2000i1p1-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behaviour of the standard and symmetric Dickey-Fuller-type tests when there is a break under the null hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • STEPHEN J. LEYBOURNE AND PAUL NEWBOLD

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen J. Leybourne And Paul Newbold, 2000. "Behaviour of the standard and symmetric Dickey-Fuller-type tests when there is a break under the null hypothesis," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 3(1), pages 1-15.
  • Handle: RePEc:ect:emjrnl:v:3:y:2000:i:1:p:1-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasco Gabriel & Luis Martins, 2011. "Cointegration tests under multiple regime shifts: An application to the stock price–dividend relationship," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 639-662, December.
    2. Sen, Amit, 2008. "Behaviour of Dickey-Fuller tests when there is a break under the unit root null hypothesis," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(6), pages 622-628, April.
    3. Josep Lluís Carrion-I-Silvestre & María Dolores Gadea, 2016. "Bounds, Breaks and Unit Root Tests," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 165-181, March.
    4. Steven Cook, 2004. "Detecting changes in persistence in linear time series," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 3(24), pages 1-11.
    5. Steven Cook & Dimitrios Vougas, 2007. "Examining the robustness of cointegration analysis under weighted symmetric estimation," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(10), pages 711-714.
    6. Psaradakis, Zacharias, 2002. "On the asymptotic behaviour of unit-root tests in the presence of a Markov trend," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 101-109, March.
    7. Yang, Lixiong & Lee, Chingnun & Su, Jen-Je, 2017. "Behavior of the standard Dickey–Fuller test when there is a Fourier-form break under the null hypothesis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 128-133.
    8. Georgiev, Iliyan, 2010. "Model-based asymptotic inference on the effect of infrequent large shocks on cointegrated variables," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 158(1), pages 37-50, September.
    9. Berg, Nathan, 2004. "No-decision classification: an alternative to testing for statistical significance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 631-650, November.
    10. Wilton Bernardino & João B. Amaral & Nelson L. Paes & Raydonal Ospina & José L. Távora, 2022. "A statistical investigation of a stock valuation model," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(8), pages 1-25, August.
    11. Roberto Baragona & Francesco Battaglia & Domenico Cucina, 2016. "Empirical Likelihood for Outlier Detection and Estimation in Autoregressive Time Series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 315-336, May.
    12. B. da Silva Lopes, Artur C., 2005. "Finite sample effects of pure seasonal mean shifts on Dickey-Fuller tests," MPRA Paper 125, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised May 2006.
    13. Steven Cook, 2003. "Empirical evidence on the robustness of the weighted symmetric unit root test," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(12), pages 761-763.
    14. Artur C. B. Da Silva Lopes, 2008. "Finite Sample Effects Of Pure Seasonal Mean Shifts On Dickey–Fuller Tests: A Simulation Study," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 76(5), pages 528-538, September.
    15. Kim, Dukpa & Perron, Pierre, 2009. "Unit root tests allowing for a break in the trend function at an unknown time under both the null and alternative hypotheses," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 148(1), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Chingnun Lee & Jyh-Lin Wu & Lixiong Yang, 2016. "A Simple Panel Unit-Root Test with Smooth Breaks in the Presence of a Multifactor Error Structure," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 78(3), pages 365-393, June.
    17. Josep Lluís Carrion‐i‐Silvestre & María Dolores Gadea, 2023. "Testing for multiple level shifts with an integrated or stationary noise component," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(6), pages 801-819, September.
    18. Steven Cook, 2005. "Rank-based unit root testing in the presence of structural change under the null: simulation results and an application to US inflation," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 607-617.
    19. Cook, Steven & Vougas, Dimitrios, 2004. "On the finite-sample size distortion of smooth transition unit root tests," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 70(3), pages 175-182, December.
    20. Iiboshi, Hirokuni & Wakita, Shigeru, 2004. "Do Structural Breaks exist in Okun’s Law? Evidence from the Lost Decade in Japan," MPRA Paper 87392, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:3:y:2004:i:24:p:1-11 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Steven Cook, 2007. "Further results on the detection of changes in persistence in linear time series," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(2), pages 145-150.
    23. Stephen Leybourne & Paul Newbold, 2003. "Spurious rejections by cointegration tests induced by structural breaks," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(9), pages 1117-1121.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ect:emjrnl:v:3:y:2000:i:1:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.