This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

How useful are tests for unit-root in distinguishing unit-root processes from stationary but non-linear processes?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Chi-Young Choi
Young-Kyu Moh

Additional information is available for the following registered author(s):

Abstract

Standard unit-root tests are known to be biased towards the non-rejection of a unit-root when they are applied to time series with non-linear dynamics. Unfortunately, not much is known about the source of the power loss mainly because the analysis on nonstationarity and nonlinearity to this date has been fragmentary. By means of a Monte Carlo study, the current paper investigates the finite sample performance of five popular unit-root tests against a wide class of non-linear dynamic models. In contrast to the common perception, our simulation results suggest that what determines the power of unit-root tests is not the specific type of nonlinearity in the alternative model, but how far the alternative model is away from the unit-root process. The presence of nonlinearity seems immaterial to the performance of unit-root tests if the non-linear process is far away from the unit-root process, which is in line with the fact established in linear framework. Among the five tests under study, the ADF test outperforms when the sample size is relatively small while the inf-t due to Park and Shintani (2005) is more powerful for relatively large sample size regardless of the form of true models. We then illustrate the empirical relevance of our analysis by reexamining the issue of mean reversion in real interest rates, often referred to the Fisher hypothesis. Copyright Royal Economic Society 2007

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2007.00200.x
File Format: text/html
File Function: link to full text
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Royal Economic Society in its journal Econometrics Journal.

Volume (Year): 10 (2007)
Issue (Month): 1 (03)
Pages: 82-112
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML, plain text, BibTeX, RIS (EndNote), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:ect:emjrnl:v:10:y:2007:i:1:p:82-112

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Web: http://www.ectj.org

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? Authors registered on the RePEc Author Service receive monthly emails with details about downloads and abstract views of their works.

This page was last updated on 2008-6-14.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.