IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2012-01-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of NAFTA on the Preference for Meat Consumption in USA: An Inverse Demand System Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sooriyakumar Krishnapillai

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural sociology, Auburn University, U.S.A.)

Abstract

This study examines the impacts of NAFTA on meat demand and develops an inverse demand system model for meat to analyze price and scale flexibility. The inverse demand system model for meat products suggests that, After NAFTA, there is a decline in average on the preference for beef consumption. The availability of low quality beef and the concern over infectious disease through the imported beef might be the reasons for this decline on the preference for beef consumption. Results show that all meats are substitutes to each other and proportionate increase in all meats reduce the price for meats.

Suggested Citation

  • Sooriyakumar Krishnapillai, 2012. "Impact of NAFTA on the Preference for Meat Consumption in USA: An Inverse Demand System Approach," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 2(1), pages 79-84.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2012-01-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/124/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Moschini, GianCarlo & Vissa, Anuradha, 1992. "A Linear Inverse Demand System," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-9, December.
    2. K. K. Gary Wong & Keith R. McLaren, 2005. "Specification and Estimation of Regular Inverse Demand Systems: A Distance Function Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(4), pages 823-834.
    3. James S. Eales & Laurian J. Unnevehr, 1993. "Simultaneity and Structural Change in U.S. Meat Demand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 75(2), pages 259-268.
    4. Kesavan, T & Buhr, Brian, 1995. "Price Determination and Dynamic Adjustments: An Inverse Demand System Approach to Meat Products in the United States," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 681-698.
    5. Toshinobu Matsuda, 2005. "Forms of Scale Curves and Differential Inverse Demand Systems," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(3), pages 786-795.
    6. Barten, A. P. & Bettendorf, L. J., 1989. "Price formation of fish : An application of an inverse demand system," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(8), pages 1509-1525, October.
    7. Deaton, Angus S & Muellbauer, John, 1980. "An Almost Ideal Demand System," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 70(3), pages 312-326, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peguero, Felipe & Kennedy, P. Lynn & Zapata, Hector O., 2018. "A Generalized Dynamic Inverse AIDS Model for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables: An Application to the U.S. Bell Pepper Industry," 2018 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2018, Jacksonville, Florida 266686, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    2. Schroeter, Christiane & Foster, Kenneth A., 2004. "The Impact Of Health Information And Demographic Changes On Aggregate Meat Demand," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20130, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    3. Chris Moore & Charles Griffiths, 2018. "Welfare analysis in a two-stage inverse demand model: an application to harvest changes in the Chesapeake Bay," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 1181-1206, November.
    4. K. K. Gary Wong & Hoanjae Park, 2018. "Consumption dynamics in inverse demand systems: an application to meat and fish demand in Korea," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 49(6), pages 777-786, November.
    5. Roheim, Cathy A. & Zhang, Dengjun, 2018. "Sustainability certification and product substitutability: Evidence from the seafood market," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 92-100.
    6. Eric Sjöberg, 2015. "Pricing on the Fish Market--Does Size Matter?," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(3), pages 277-296.
    7. Lee, Young-Jae & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2013. "Quantity And Exchange Rate Effects On U.S. Trout Prices," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 142133, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    8. Yeboah, Godfred & Maynard, Leigh J., 2004. "The Impact Of Bse, Fmd, And U.S. Export Promotion Expenditures On Japanese Meat Demand," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19978, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Hayes, Kathy J. & Margaritis, Dimitris, 2008. "Estimating demand with distance functions: Parameterization in the primal and dual," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 147(2), pages 266-274, December.
    10. Steen, Marie, 2006. "Flower Power at the Dutch Flower Auctions? Application of an Inverse Almost Ideal Demand System," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25441, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Grant, Jason H. & Foster, Kenneth A., 2005. "An Inverse Almost Ideal Demand System of Fresh Tomatoes in the U.S," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19193, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Hjertstrand, Per, 2022. "Nonparametric Analysis of the Mixed-Demand Model," Working Paper Series 1430, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    13. Suh, Dong Hee & Guan, Zhengfei & Khachatryan, Hayk, 2017. "The impact of Mexican competition on the U.S. strawberry industry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(4), April.
    14. Moore, Chris, 2015. "Welfare Estimates of Avoided Ocean Acidification in the U.S. Mollusk Market," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 1-13.
    15. Lee, Young-Jae & Kennedy, P. Lynn, 2008. "An Examination of Inverse Demand Models: An Application to the U.S. Crawfish Industry," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 37(2), pages 1-14.
    16. Jason H. Grant & Dayton M. Lambert & Kenneth A. Foster, 2010. "A Seasonal Inverse Almost Ideal Demand System for North American Fresh Tomatoes," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 58(2), pages 215-234, June.
    17. Toshinobu Matsuda, 2005. "Differential Demand Systems: A Further Look at Barten's Synthesis," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 71(3), pages 607-619, January.
    18. Karagiannis, G. & Katranidis, S. & Velentzas, K., 2000. "An error correction almost ideal demand system for meat in Greece," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 22(1), pages 29-35, January.
    19. Anonymous & Bosch, Darrell J., 2013. "Table of contents," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(01), February.
    20. Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2013. "On Demand Analysis and Dynamics: A Benefit Function Approach," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 149683, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Inverse demand system model; NAFTA; Price and Scale Flexibility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q11 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis; Prices
    • Q17 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agriculture in International Trade
    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2012-01-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.