Edi Karni () (Dept. of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, U.S.A.) Zvi Safra () (Faculty of Management, Tel Aviv University, Israel)
Abstract
We present an axiomatic model depicting the choice behavior of a self-interest seeking moral individual over random allocation procedures. Individual preferences are decomposed into a self-interest component and a component representing the individual's moral value judgment. Each component has a distinct utility representation, and the preference relation depicting the choice behavior is representable by a real-valued function defined on the components utilities. The utility representing the self-interest component is linear and the utility representing the individual's moral value judgment is quasi-concave. The addition of a hexagon condition implies that the utility representing the individual's preference is additively separable in the components utilities. Copyright The Econometric Society 2002.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
file. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Econometric Society in its journal Econometrica.
Volume (Year): 70 (2002) Issue (Month): 1 (January) Pages: 263-284 Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML,
plain text,
BibTeX,
RIS (EndNote),
ReDIF
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Christopher F. Baum).
Related research
Keywords:
Cited by: (explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)
Border, Kim C. & Ghirardato, Paolo & Segal, Uzi, 2005.
"Objective subjective probabilities,"
Working Papers
1228, California Institute of Technology, Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences.
[Downloadable!]
Other versions:
David Austen-Smith & Tim Feddersen, 2002.
"Deliberation and Voting Rules,"
Discussion Papers
1359, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
[Downloadable!]