Advanced Search
MyIDEAS: Login to save this article or follow this journal

Statistical Inference for Stochastic Dominance and for the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality

Contents:

Author Info

  • Russell Davidson
  • Jean-Yves Duclos

Abstract

We derive the asymptotic sampling distribution of various estimators frequently used to order distributions in terms of poverty, welfare and inequality. This includes estimators of most of the poverty indices currently in use, as well as estimators of the curves used to infer stochastic dominance of any order. These curves can be used to determine whether poverty, inequality or social welfare is greater in one distribution than in another for general classes of indices. We also derive the sampling distribution of the maximal poverty lines (or income censoring thresholds) up to which we may confidently assert that poverty or social welfare is greater in one distribution than in another. The sampling distribution of convenient estimators for dual approaches to the measurement of poverty is also established. The statistical results are established for deterministic or stochastic poverty lines as well as for paired or independent samples of incomes. Our results are briefly illustrated using data for 6 countries drawn from the Luxembourg Income Study data bases. On étudie les propriétés asymptotiques de plusieurs estimateurs fréquemment utilisés pour ordonner les répartitions de revenus en termes de pauvreté, bien-être social, et inégalité. Ces estimateurs incluent les estimateurs de la plupart des indices de pauvreté couramment en usage ainsi que les estimateurs des courbes utiles pour l'inférence de la dominance stochastique de n'importe quel ordre. Ces courbes nous permettent de déterminer si la pauvreté, l'inégalité ou le bien-être social sont plus élevés dans une répartition que dans une autre pour des classes générales d'indices. On étudie aussi la distribution échantillonnale des seuils maximum de pauvreté ou de censure des revenus jusqu'auxquels on peut affirmer sans ambiguïté que la pauvreté ou le bien-être social sont plus élevés dans une répartition de revenus que dans une autre. La distribution échantillonnale d'estimateurs po

(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Download Info

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Bibliographic Info

Article provided by Econometric Society in its journal Econometrica.

Volume (Year): 68 (2000)
Issue (Month): 6 (November)
Pages: 1435-1464

as in new window
Handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:68:y:2000:i:6:p:1435-1464

Contact details of provider:
Phone: 1 212 998 3820
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Email:
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/memb.asp?ref=0012-9682

Related research

Keywords:

Other versions of this item:

Find related papers by JEL classification:

References

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

Citations

Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
as in new window

Cited by:
This item has more than 25 citations. To prevent cluttering this page, these citations are listed on a separate page.

Lists

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:emetrp:v:68:y:2000:i:6:p:1435-1464. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum).

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.