IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecj/econjl/v100y1990i401p478-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Search Intensity in Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Harrison, Glenn W
  • Morgan, Peter

Abstract

The theoretical literature on the search behavior of workers and consumers typically considers three search strategies. These strategies are characterized by alternative assumptions about the temporal and atemporal intensity of search. The first strategy is an atemporally intensive fixed-sample-size strategy which restricts the agent to collecting exactly one sample of contemporaneous offers but allows him to choose the sample size. The second strategy is a temporally intensive pure-sequential strategy which allows the agent to collect as many samples as he chooses but restricts the size of each to unity. The third strategy is a variable-sample-size strategy, a generalization of the first two which allows the agent to sequentially choose both how many samples to take and the size of each sample. We report an experimental comparison and evaluation of these three search strategies. Copyright 1990 by Royal Economic Society.

Suggested Citation

  • Harrison, Glenn W & Morgan, Peter, 1990. "Search Intensity in Experiments," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 100(401), pages 478-486, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:100:y:1990:i:401:p:478-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0013-0133%28199006%29100%3A401%3C478%3ASIIE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-6&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:econjl:v:100:y:1990:i:401:p:478-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.