We examine how subsidy policies to support child-rearing of households affect the fertility rate in a textbook OLG model extended to account for a labour market imperfection (e.g., a minimum wage or a monopolistic union’s wage) as well as endogenous fertility. It is shown that increasing the child subsidy actually reduces population growth. The policy implications for countries with imperfect labour markets and low fertility (e.g., the most part of European Union countries) are noteworthy: if the government’s objective is to increase the fertility rate, a child-subsidy support policy should not be introduced at all. Contrary to conventional wisdom, our findings in fact reveal that, for any given value of the minimum (or union’s) wage, the introduction of a child subsidy reduces capital accumulation and increases unemployment in the long-run, and ultimately it negatively affects the demand for children in spite of a reduced cost of child-rearing.
Download Info
To download:
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the
proper application to
view it first. Information about this may be contained
in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read
the IDEAS help
page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS
site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Publisher Info
Article provided by Economics Bulletin in its journal Economics Bulletin.
Find related papers by JEL classification: J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics H2 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
References listed on IDEAS Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
Did you know? Each page is provided with a technical contact, in case something is not right with the supplied information. See under "publisher info".