Assurance Problem in Gift Exchange Game: An Experimental Study
Abstract
The workers’ reciprocity in a simple Gift Exchange Game has been demonstrated in prior research to be enforcement problem. We showed that potential future interactions could not motivate the workers significantly because of assurance problem. Lack of information about employers’ reciprocal type made workers reluctant to cooperate. We conducted three experimental treatments to investigate the effort patterns. We found that workers’ efforts were not significantly different between with and without repetition effect. Workers did not cooperate much even when there was enforcement. The assurance problem was overcome when workers could judge the reciprocal type of the employer by comparing current wage with market wage. We found that workers responded more to market wage than current wage and were significantly more cooperative.Download Info
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.Bibliographic Info
Article provided by Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Economics and Finance in its journal Economic Analysis and Policy (EAP).
Volume (Year): 41 (2011)
Issue (Month): 1 (March)
Pages: 33-108
Contact details of provider:
Postal: GPO Box 2434, BRISBANE QLD 4001
Email:
Web page: http://www.eap-journal.com/
More information through EDIRC
Related research
Keywords: Reciprocity; Assurance Problem; Wage Rent; Focal Point;Find related papers by JEL classification:
- D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Economics; Underlying Principles
- C91 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Laboratory, Individual Behavior
- D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
References
No references listed on IDEASYou can help add them by filling out this form.
Citations
Lists
This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eap:articl:v:41:y:2011:i:1:p:33-108For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Manuela Torgler).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

