Forestry Managers' Perceptions of the Feasibility of Incorporating Non-market Value Estimates into Financial Environmental Reporting
AbstractThere is currently considerable interest in environmental economic valuation methods because of their importance in policy development and litigious issues. Several accountants have recently advocated these valuation techniques within accounting and reporting frameworks. Environmental accounting can incorporate financially quantified environmental externalities into conventional reporting systems, so that financial statements communicate the commercial and environmental performance of an organisation to its stakeholders to allow more fully-informed decisions. This paper examines the feasibility of developing a financial environmental reporting system for an Australian public sector forestry organization. Data collected with the assistance of the organization were analysed using descriptive and inferential coding. Reactions of forest managers to the introduction of environmental reporting, and their implementation experience, were examined. Potential barriers to the reporting system include a lack of funding, internal resistance to economic valuations due at least in part to low knowledge levels in relation to non-market valuation methods, stakeholder resistance, and the absence of recognised environmental indices against which to report. Potential benefits include capacity to report on sustainability of forest management, and information with which to negotiate settlements with powerful stakeholders and to seek funding for public-good components of operations.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Queensland University of Technology (QUT), School of Economics and Finance in its journal Economic Analysis and Policy (EAP).
Volume (Year): 32 (2002)
Issue (Month): 2 (June Special Issue)
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- Q23 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Forestry
- Q26 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Recreational Aspects of Natural Resources
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Manuela Torgler).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.