IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2012i5p65-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Mediating Role of Perceived Risk when Buying Online

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Iconaru

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

This paper aim is to assess if consumers’ perceived risk can mediate the relationship between trust and consumers’ intention to buy online. Several others studies indicate that perceived risk acts like a barrier to online buying adoption, while trust in the online vendors and the reliability of the online environment is an enhancer of consumers’ intention to buy online. Two models were developed for the purpose of this study and Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis was used on data collected from 98 respondents. Three variables were introduced in the model: perceived risk, perceived trust and consumers’ intention to buy online. Each variable was formed as a formative latent variable using multi-items, measured on a 7 point Likert scale. The results of the first structural equation modeling indicate that trust is capable of explaining 44% of the variance in consumers’ intention to buy online. Perceived risk was introduced in the second structural equation modeling and results indicate that it has a negative direct effect on consumers’ intention to buy online . However, perceived trust is the sole variable capable of decreasing consumers’ perceived risk. Thus, online vendors should put a great emphasize on creating a trustful environment for selling online goods and services.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Iconaru, 2012. "The Mediating Role of Perceived Risk when Buying Online," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 5(5), pages 65-74, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2012:i:5:p:65-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/1406/1317
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2012:i:5:p:65-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.