IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dug/actaec/y2010i4p64-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hotel Classification Systems: A Comparison of International Case Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Roberta Minazzi

    (University of Insubria, Italy)

Abstract

Over the last few decades we have witnessed an increasing interest of scholars and especially operators in service quality in the lodging business. Firstly, it is important to observe that the diverseness of the hospitality industry also affects the classification of hotel quality. We can actually find many programmes, classifications and seals of quality promoted by public authorities and private companies that create confusion in the consumer perceptions of hotel quality. Moreover, new electronic distribution channels and their ratings are becoming a new way to gather information about a hotel and its quality. Secondly, a point that can cause complications is that different countries and regions can choose differing approaches depending on the features of the classification (number of levels, symbols used, etc.) and the nature of the programme (public, private). Considering these assumptions and the recent changes in the Italian hotel classification system, this paper aims to analyse the situation in Italy, underlining both its positive and negative aspects and comparing it with other European and North American cases. Based on a review of literature and tourism laws as well as personal interviews with public authorities and exponents of the private sectors, we were able to identify critical issues and trends in hotel classification systems. The comparison of case studies shows a heterogeneous situation. Points in common are the scale and the symbol used but, if we analyse the requirements of each category, we discover very different circumstances, also sometimes in the same country. A future European classification system could be possible only after a standardization of minimum requirements and criteria at a national level. In this situation brands and online consumers’ feedbacks become even more considered by the customers in the hospitality industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Roberta Minazzi, 2010. "Hotel Classification Systems: A Comparison of International Case Studies," Acta Universitatis Danubius. OEconomica, Danubius University of Galati, issue 4(4), pages 64-86, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2010:i:4:p:64-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/oeconomica/article/view/761/693
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Wiele, A. & Boselie, J.P.P.E.F. & Hesselink, M., 2001. "Empirical Evidence for the Relation between Customer Satisfaction and Business Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2001-32-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    2. van der Wiele, A. & Brown, A.M., 2002. "ISO 9000 Series Certification Over Time: what have we learnt?," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-30-ORG, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Núñez-Serrano, Juan A. & Turrión, Jaime & Velázquez, Francisco J., 2014. "Are stars a good indicator of hotel quality? Assymetric information and regulatory heterogeneity in Spain," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 77-87.
    2. Luigino Baldassin & Massimo Gallo & Elena Mattevi, 2017. "Tourism in European cities," Tourism Economics, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-28, February.
    3. Femi Odebiyi & Vitaliya Gontar, 2020. "User-Generated Reviews And Official Star Ratings: Can The Two Work Together In Hotel Evaluation Systems?," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 18(1), pages 37-48, May.
    4. Rafał Nagaj & Brigita Žuromskaitė, 2020. "Security Measures as a Factor in the Competitiveness of Accommodation Facilities," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Mwaura, Francis & Ssekitoleko, Solomon, 2012. "Reviewing Uganda’s tourism sector for economic and social upgrading," Research Series 148957, Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).
    6. Ting Jiang & Shaobing Zhuo & Chaozhi Zhang & Jun Gao, 2019. "The Impact of Institutions on the Evolution of Tourism Accommodation Format: Evidence from Wulingyuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carretta, Alessandro & Farina, Vincenzo & Fiordelisi, Franco & Schwizer, Paola, 2006. "Corporate culture and shareholder value in banking industry," MPRA Paper 8304, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Carsten Horn & Markus Rudolf, 2011. "Service quality in the private banking business," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 25(2), pages 173-195, June.
    3. Ernest Tweneboah-Koduah & Augustine Yuty Duweh Farley, 2015. "Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in the Retail Banking Sector of Ghana," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 249-249, December.
    4. Azevedo, Susana & Cudney, Elizabeth A. & Grilo, António & Carvalho, Helena & Cruz-Machado, V., 2012. "The influence of eco-innovation supply chain practices on business eco-efficiency," MPRA Paper 42704, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dug:actaec:y:2010:i:4:p:64-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Daniela Robu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedanro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.