This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Book Review: Understanding Reforms: Post 1991 India

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
K. L. Krishna (Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics, Delhi 110007, India.)
Abstract

Book Review of Suresh D. Tendulkar and T. A. Bhavani, Understanding Reforms: Post 1991 India, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2007, pp. xii + 206, ISBN 0195687116.

Download Info
To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Publisher Info
Article provided by Department of Economics, Delhi School of Economics in its journal Indian Economic Review.

Volume (Year): 44 (2009)
Issue (Month): 1 (July)
Pages: 150-152
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:dse:indecr:v:44:y:2009:i:1:p:150-152

Contact details of provider:
Postal: Delhi 110 007
Phone: 91-11-2766-6533/34/35, 2766-6703/04/05
Email:
Web page: http://www.econdse.org/
More information through EDIRC

Order Information:
Email:
Web: http://www.ierdse.org/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Pami Dua).

Related research
Keywords:

Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? All the bibliographic data shown here has been contributed by volunteers, thereby helping to keep this service free.

This page was last updated on 2009-12-21.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.