IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwwob/83-37-1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hohe Führungspositionen: in der Finanzbranche haben Frauen im Vergleich zu Männern besonders geringe Chancen

Author

Listed:
  • Elke Holst
  • Martin Friedrich

Abstract

Overall, women are still grossly underrepresented in management positions in Germany. However, what has been dubbed the gender leadership gap, i.e., the difference between the share of all employees who are women and the share of women in senior management positions, varies considerably across the different sectors. The present report shows that women have the lowest odds of occupying a senior management position in the financial sector although—measured against the total number of employees in the sector—the industry has a particularly large number of senior management positions. Possible explanations for this are the exceptionally masculine culture and the specific legal requirements of CEOs in the financial sector which are implicitly biased toward men. Generally, part-time work also has an adverse effect on women’s career prospects: for many management positions, being able to work full-time is a prerequisite which often excludes women from taking on these roles due to the traditional division of household and family labor—the same obviously does not apply to men. Policy-makers and the business community should therefore adopt measures to increase gender equality in terms of working hours. The “family working-time benefits model” and improvements in the quality of child day care proposed by DIW Berlin would be steps in the right direction. Frauen sind in Führungspositionen insgesamt noch immer deutlich unterrepräsentiert. Der sogenannte Gender Leadership Gap, also die Differenz zwischen dem Anteil von Frauen an allen abhängig Beschäftigten und dem Anteil von Frauen in hohen Führungspositionen, variiert zwischen einzelnen Branchen allerdings erheblich. Der vorliegende Bericht zeigt, dass die Chancen von Frauen in der Finanzbranche am geringsten sind, obwohl es dort – gemessen an allen Beschäftigten in der Branche – besonders viele hohe Führungspositionen gibt. Gründe dafür könnten eine besonders maskuline Kultur sowie die speziellen gesetzlichen Anforderungen an GeschäftsleiterInnen im Finanzsektor sein, die implizit Männern stärker zugutekommen. Generell schmälert auch Teilzeitarbeit die Karrierechancen von Frauen: Für viele Führungspositionen ist eine Vollzeittätigkeit Voraussetzung, der Frauen aufgrund der nach wie vor tradierten Aufgabenteilung in Familie und Haushalt aber oft nicht nachgehen können – im Gegensatz zu Männern. Politik und Wirtschaft sollten daher Maßnahmen ergreifen, die den Erwerbsumfang von Männern und Frauen angleichen. Die vom DIW Berlin vorgeschlagene Familienarbeitszeit und der qualitative Ausbau der Kinderbetreuung wären wichtige Schritte auf diesem Weg.

Suggested Citation

  • Elke Holst & Martin Friedrich, 2016. "Hohe Führungspositionen: in der Finanzbranche haben Frauen im Vergleich zu Männern besonders geringe Chancen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 83(37), pages 827-838.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:83-37-1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.diw.de/documents/publikationen/73/diw_01.c.542235.de/16-37-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellguth, Peter & Kohaut, Susanne & Möller, Iris, 2017. "Wo schaffen es Frauen an die Spitze? Eine empirische Analyse mit Betriebsdaten [Where do women reach top positions? An empirical analysis with establishment data]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 24(2), pages 196-217.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Gender; Gender Leadership Gap; managerial positions; promotion probability; Executive Committees (ExCos); glass ceiling; working hours; motherhood penalty; financial sector; BaFin; corporate culture; temporal flexibility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services
    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J78 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor Discrimination - - - Public Policy (including comparable worth)
    • L32 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Public Enterprises; Public-Private Enterprises
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M51 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwob:83-37-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.