IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/86-4-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Zur finanziellen Bildung der privaten Haushalte in Deutschland: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse aus der Studie „Private Haushalte und ihre Finanzen (PHF)“

Author

Listed:
  • Tobias Schmidt
  • Panagiota Tzamourani

Abstract

As financial products get increasingly complex as private pensions become more important for old-age provision, households face more and more important and far-reaching financial decisions. Therefore financial literacy and financial knowledge are becoming ever more important. Measuring financial literacy and its implications is thus an important concern. The “Panel on household finances (PHF)” data shows that about 60 percent of the responding households have a high financial literacy, as measured by the three standard financial literacy questions on understanding of inflation, interest rates and portfolio diversification. The level of financial literacy differs by households’ and individuals’ characteristics. Persons in households with high income or high wealth exhibit higher literacy levels than other households, for example. Different levels of financial literacy are correlated with different investment decisions. Households with high literacy are more likely to own securities and more willing to take at least average investment risks. Neue Finanzprodukte und ein stärkerer Fokus auf private Altersvorsorge stellen Haushalte vor neue Herausforderungen und fordern von ihnen immer mehr und weitreichendere finanzielle Entscheidungen. Finanzielle Bildung spielt bei diesen Entscheidungen eine wichtige Rolle. Finanzielle Bildung zu messen und deren Auswirkungen zu verstehen, ist daher von großer Bedeutung. Die Ergebnisse der Studie „Private Haushalte und ihre Finanzen (PHF)“ zeigen, dass etwa 60 Prozent der Haushalte in Deutschland über eine hohe finanzielle Bildung verfügen, gemessen mithilfe von drei Standardfragen zu Zinseffekten, Inflation und Risiken bei Wertpapierinvestitionen. Dabei gibt es Unterschiede hinsichtlich soziodemografischer Merkmale. Beispielsweise ist eine hohe finanzielle Bildung mit hohem Bruttoeinkommen oder Nettovermögen korreliert. Ob die gefundenen Zusammenhänge kausal sind, bleibt offen. Unterschiedliche Niveaus an finanzieller Bildung gehen mit unterschiedlichen Anlageentscheidungen einher. Etwa besitzen Haushalte von Personen mit hoher finanzieller Bildung häufiger Wertpapiere als andere Haushalte und sind generell eher bereit, zumindest moderate finanzielle Risiken einzugehen.

Suggested Citation

  • Tobias Schmidt & Panagiota Tzamourani, 2017. "Zur finanziellen Bildung der privaten Haushalte in Deutschland: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse aus der Studie „Private Haushalte und ihre Finanzen (PHF)“," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 86(4), pages 31-49.
  • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:86-4-4
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.86.4.31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.86.4.31
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.86.4.31?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Altmann Kristina & Bernard René & Le Blanc Julia & Gabor-Toth Enikö & Hebbat Malik & Kothmayr Lisa & Schmidt Tobias & Tzamourani Panagiota & Werner Daniel & Zhu Junyi, 2020. "The Panel on Household Finances (PHF) – Microdata on household wealth in Germany," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 21(3), pages 373-400, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial Literacy; wealth survey; households’ portfolio choice;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:86-4-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.