IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/diw/diwvjh/77-2-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deutlicher Zusammenhang zwischen Innovationsfähigkeit und Einstellungen zu Wissenschaft und Technik im internationalen Vergleich

Author

Listed:
  • Heike Belitz
  • Tanja Kirn

Abstract

The article deals with the question if values of citizens and their attitudes towards science and technology have a critical impact on the innovative capacity of a country. The social climate for innovation and the innovative capacity of a country are multidimensional phenomena. They can be measured and assessed by the composite innovation indicator of the DIW Berlin. Results of international surveys provide the database for values and attitudes of citizens. For 17 selected industrial countries the analysis reveals positive correlations between some sub-indicators of the social innovative climate, particularly of the attitudes towards science and technology, and the innovative capacity. Furthermore, scientific and technical knowledge as well as trust in innovation actors support positive attitudes towards science and technology. In our sample of industrial countries Germany ranks middle both with respect to innovative capacity and attitudes of their citizens towards science and technology. Im Mittelpunkt des Artikels steht die Frage nach dem Einfluss von Werten und Einstellungen der Menschen zu Technik und Wissenschaft auf die Innovationsfähigkeit eines Landes. Das gesellschaftliche Innovationsklima und die Innovationsfähigkeit sind mehrdimensionale Phänomene. Deshalb wird die für den Innovationsindikator des DIW Berlin erarbeitete Methodik genutzt, um ihre einzelnen Komponenten zu messen und schließlich auch zusammenzufassen. Datengrundlage zur Erfassung von Werten und Einstellungen sind die Ergebnisse repräsentativer Personenbefragungen. In den 17 hier untersuchten Industrieländern zeigen sich positive Korrelationen zwischen Indikatoren für einige Facetten des gesellschaftlichen Innovationsklimas, darunter besonders der Einstellungen zu Wissenschaft und Technik, und der Innovationsfähigkeit. Auch ist zu erkennen, dass das Vorhandensein von naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Grundkenntnissen sowie von Vertrauen in die Innovationsakteure ihrerseits positive Einstellungen zu Technik und Wissenschaft unterstützen. Deutschland liegt sowohl hinsichtlich seiner Innovationsfähigkeit als auch bei den Einstellungen der Bürger zu Wissenschaft und Technik im Mittelfeld der untersuchten Industrieländer.

Suggested Citation

  • Heike Belitz & Tanja Kirn, 2008. "Deutlicher Zusammenhang zwischen Innovationsfähigkeit und Einstellungen zu Wissenschaft und Technik im internationalen Vergleich," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 77(2), pages 47-64.
    • Handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-2-4
    DOI: 10.3790/vjh.77.2.47
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.3790/vjh.77.2.47
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/vjh.77.2.47?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. La Porta, Rafael, et al, 1997. "Trust in Large Organizations," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 87(2), pages 333-338, May.
    2. Michela Nardo & Michaela Saisana & Andrea Saltelli & Stefano Tarantola & Anders Hoffman & Enrico Giovannini, 2005. "Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide," OECD Statistics Working Papers 2005/3, OECD Publishing.
    3. Heike Belitz & Tanja Kirn & Axel Werwatz, 2006. "Zu wenig Frauen in Forschung und Innovation," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(45), pages 643-648.
    4. Heike Belitz & Tanja Kirn & Axel Werwatz, 2006. "Verhaltensweisen und Einstellungen der Bevölkerung hemmen die Innovationsfähigkeit in Deutschland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(8), pages 89-98.
    5. Axel Werwatz & Heike Belitz & Tanja Kirn & Jens Schmidt-Ehmcke, 2006. "Innovationsindikator Deutschland 2006," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 22, number pbk22, Enero-Abr.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexander Ebner, 2010. "Varieties of Capitalism and the Limits of Entrepreneurship Policy: Institutional Reform in Germany’s Coordinated Market Economy," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 319-341, September.
    2. Alexander Ebner & Fabian Bocek, 2015. "Best Practices as to How to Support Investment in Intangible Assets. WWWforEurope Working Paper No. 101," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 58258, Juni.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grupp, Hariolf & Schubert, Torben, 2010. "Review and new evidence on composite innovation indicators for evaluating national performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 67-78, February.
    2. Axel Werwatz & Heike Belitz & Marius Clemens & Tanja Kirn & Jens Schmidt-Ehmcke & Stephanie Schneider, 2007. "Innovationsindikator Deutschland 2007: Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag der Deutsche Telekom Stiftung und des Bundesverbandes der Deutschen Industrie," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 33, number pbk33, Enero-Abr.
    3. Roberta Dessì & Salvatore Piccolo, 2008. "Two is Company, N is a Crowd? Merchant Guilds and Social Capital," CSEF Working Papers 202, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy, revised 12 Jul 2009.
    4. Oasis Kodila-Tedika & Julius Agbor, 2016. "Does Trust Matter for Entrepreneurship: Evidence from a Cross-Section of Countries," Economies, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Leonardo Becchetti & Pierluigi Conzo & Alessandro Romeo, 2014. "Violence, trust, and trustworthiness: evidence from a Nairobi slum," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 66(1), pages 283-305, January.
    6. Hertrich Markus, 2019. "A Novel Housing Price Misalignment Indicator for Germany," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 759-794, December.
    7. Alberto Alesina & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2011. "Segregation and the Quality of Government in a Cross Section of Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(5), pages 1872-1911, August.
    8. Arvind Ashta & Djamchid Assadi, 2009. "An Analysis of European Online micro-lending Websites," Working Papers CEB 09-059.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Fabian Kosse & Thomas Deckers & Pia Pinger & Hannah Schildberg-Hörisch & Armin Falk, 2020. "The Formation of Prosociality: Causal Evidence on the Role of Social Environment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(2), pages 434-467.
    10. Yaron Zelekha & Léo-Paul Dana, 2019. "Social Capital Versus Cultural Capital Determinants of Entrepreneurship: An Empirical Study of the African Continent," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 28(2), pages 250-269, September.
    11. Puspitawati, Eka, 2011. "Determinants Of Trust In The Indonesian Potato Industry: A Comparison Among Groups Of Potato Farmers," 2011 Conference (55th), February 8-11, 2011, Melbourne, Australia 100699, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Philippe Aghion & Yann Algan & Pierre Cahuc & Andrei Shleifer, 2010. "Regulation and Distrust," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 125(3), pages 1015-1049.
    13. Drago, Carlo & Ginesti, Gianluca & Pongelli, Claudia & Sciascia, Salvatore, 2018. "Reporting strategies: What makes family firms beat around the bush? Family-related antecedents of annual report readability," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 142-150.
    14. He, Quqiong & Pan, Ying & Sarangi, Sudipta, 2018. "Lineage-based heterogeneity and cooperative behavior in rural China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 248-269.
    15. Chaudhuri, Ananish & Sopher, Barry & Strand, Paul, 2002. "Cooperation in social dilemmas, trust and reciprocity," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 231-249, April.
    16. Naresh Khatri, 2009. "Consequences of Power Distance Orientation in Organisations," Vision, , vol. 13(1), pages 1-9, January.
    17. Luis Medrano-Adán & Vicente Salas-Fumás & J. Sanchez-Asin, 2015. "Heterogeneous entrepreneurs from occupational choices in economies with minimum wages," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 597-619, March.
    18. Wu, Wenfeng & Firth, Michael & Rui, Oliver M., 2014. "Trust and the provision of trade credit," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 146-159.
    19. Fabio Pammolli & Francesco Porcelli & Francesco Vidoli & Guido Borà, 2014. "La spesa sanitaria delle Regioni in Italia - Saniregio 3," Working Papers CERM 02-2014, Competitività, Regole, Mercati (CERM).
    20. repec:ipg:wpaper:13 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Yi-Min Chen, 2008. "How Much Does Country Matter?," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 31(4), pages 404-435, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    National innovation system; innovation indicator; attitudes towards science and technology;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O57 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Comparative Studies of Countries

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwvjh:77-2-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bibliothek (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diwbede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.