IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dij/revfcs/v8y2005iq4p63-91.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Étudier le management de l’imprévu:méthode dynamique d’observation in situ

Author

Listed:
  • Benoît Journé

    (Université de Nantes)

Abstract

(VF)L’article présente une méthode d’observation dynamique des activités de prise de décision et de « sensemaking » qui fondent la capacité de l’organisation à gérer l’imprévu. Cette méthode, développée dans le contexte de la sûreté nucléaire, vise à éviter les biais de reconstitution a posteriori et de décontextualisation des données qui affectent traditionnellement les analyses d’accidents. La méthode combine opportunisme et rigueur en articulant quatre stratégies d’observation in situ. Chaque stratégie est décrite. Les conditions d’usage de la méthode sont discutées de même que ses champs d’application potentiels.(VA) This article presents a dynamic observational method designed to study the activities of decision-making and “sensemaking” which underlie the organization’s ability to manage the unexpected. The aim of this method, designed in the context of nuclear safety, is to avoid the bias of a posteriori reconstruction and that of decontextualization of data. This method involves opportunism and rigor by combining four observational strategies. Each strategy is described. The conditions in which such a method can be used are discussed, along with its potential sphere of application.

Suggested Citation

  • Benoît Journé, 2005. "Étudier le management de l’imprévu:méthode dynamique d’observation in situ," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 8(4), pages 63-91, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:8:y:2005:i:q4:p:63-91
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec-crego.u-bourgogne.fr/images/stories/rev/084091.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dennis A. Gioia & Kumar Chittipeddi, 1991. "Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(6), pages 433-448, September.
    2. Julia Balogun & Anne Sigismund Huff & Phyl Johnson, 2003. "Three Responses to the Methodological Challenges of Studying Strategizing," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(1), pages 197-224, January.
    3. Karlene H. Roberts, 1990. "Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 160-176, May.
    4. Stephen R. Barley, 1990. "Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longitudinal Field Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(3), pages 220-247, August.
    5. Stephen R. Barley & Gideon Kunda, 2001. "Bringing Work Back In," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(1), pages 76-95, February.
    6. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, 1991. "Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 40-57, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rudolph, Jenny & Hatakenaka, Sachi & Carroll, John S., 2002. "Organizational Learning from Experience in High-Hazard Industries: Problem Investigation as Off-Line Reflective Practice," Working papers 4359-02, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    2. Elizabeth Long Lingo, 2020. "Entrepreneurial Leadership as Creative Brokering: The Process and Practice of Co‐creating and Advancing Opportunity," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(5), pages 962-1001, July.
    3. Linus Dahlander & Lars Frederiksen, 2012. "The Core and Cosmopolitans: A Relational View of Innovation in User Communities," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 988-1007, August.
    4. Mehmet Ali Köseoglu & John A. Parnell & Melissa Yan Yee Yick, 2021. "Identifying influential studies and maturity level in intellectual structure of fields: evidence from strategic management," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1271-1309, February.
    5. Paola Perez-Aleman, 2011. "Collective Learning in Global Diffusion: Spreading Quality Standards in a Developing Country Cluster," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 173-189, February.
    6. Daniel Geiger & Jochen Koch, 2008. "Von der individuellen Routine zur organisationalen Praktik — Ein neues Paradigma für die Organisationsforschung?," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 60(7), pages 693-712, November.
    7. Mathieu Detchessahar & Benoît Journé, 2018. "Managing Strategic Discussions in Organizations: A Habermasian Perspective," Post-Print hal-02070709, HAL.
    8. Seungdoe Lee & Goo Hyeok Chung, 2020. "Cultural Entrepreneurship: Between-Organization Cultural Isomorphism and Within-Organization Culture Shaping," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(3), pages 21582440209, July.
    9. Paula Jarzabkowski & Sarah Kaplan, 2015. "Strategy tools-in-use: A framework for understanding “technologies of rationality” in practice," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(4), pages 537-558, April.
    10. Hendy, Jane & Barlow, James, 2012. "The role of the organizational champion in achieving health system change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 348-355.
    11. Thibaut Bardon & Lionel Garreau & Chahrazad Abdallah & Benoît Journé & Maja Korica, 2020. "Rethinking Observation: Challenges and Practices," Post-Print hal-02986240, HAL.
    12. Katherine C. Kellogg & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2006. "Life in the Trading Zone: Structuring Coordination Across Boundaries in Postbureaucratic Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 22-44, February.
    13. Vincent Giolito & Paul Verdin, 2017. "Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Error Management," Working Papers CEB 17-029, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    14. Anna Yström & Hedvig Aspenberg, 2017. "Open For Innovation? Practices Supporting Collaboration In Swedish Regional Clusters," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 21(05), pages 1-28, June.
    15. Sally Maitlis & Scott Sonenshein, 2010. "Sensemaking in Crisis and Change: Inspiration and Insights From Weick (1988)," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 551-580, May.
    16. Ahmed, Zafor, 2018. "Explaining the unpredictability: A social capital perspective on ICT intervention," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 175-186.
    17. Martha S. Feldman & Wanda J. Orlikowski, 2011. "Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 1240-1253, October.
    18. Willem, Annick & Girginov, Vassil & Toohey, Kristine, 2019. "Governing bodies of sport as knowledge brokers in Sport-for-All communities of practice," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 584-599.
    19. M.-J. Avenier & J. Bartunek, 2010. "Bridging a supposedly unbridgeable gap: elaborating scientific knowledge from and for practice," Post-Print halshs-00526745, HAL.
    20. Raghu Garud & Roger L. M. Dunbar & Caroline A. Bartel, 2011. "Dealing with Unusual Experiences: A Narrative Perspective on Organizational Learning," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(3), pages 587-601, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    méthodologie; observation in situ; situations imprévues; cognition; fiabilité; résilience; sensemaking; activité; methodology; observation in situ; unexpected situations; cognition; reliability; resilience; activity.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dij:revfcs:v:8:y:2005:i:q4:p:63-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Informatique Technique MSH Dijon (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.revues.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.