IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/utilit/v20y2008i04p462-471_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Consistency of Qualitative Hedonism and the Value of (at Least Some) Malicious Pleasures

Author

Listed:
  • FLETCHER, GUY

Abstract

In this article, I examine two of the standard objections to forms of value hedonism. The first is the common claim, most famously made by Bradley and Moore, that Mill's qualitative hedonism is inconsistent. The second is the apparent problem for quantitative hedonism in dealing with malicious pleasures. I argue that qualitative hedonism is consistent, even if it is implausible on other grounds. I then go on to show how our intuitions about malicious pleasure might be misleading.

Suggested Citation

  • Fletcher, Guy, 2008. "The Consistency of Qualitative Hedonism and the Value of (at Least Some) Malicious Pleasures," Utilitas, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 462-471, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:20:y:2008:i:04:p:462-471_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0953820808003270/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:utilit:v:20:y:2008:i:04:p:462-471_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/uti .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.