IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v18y1983i04p411-424_02.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mean-Variance Utility Functions and the Demand for Risky Assets: An Empirical Analysis Using Flexible Functional Forms

Author

Listed:
  • Aivazian, Varouj A.
  • Callen, Jeffrey L.
  • Krinsky, Itzhak
  • Kwan, Clarence C. Y.

Abstract

In a recent study, Levy and Markowitz [15] demonstrate that, at least for some utility functions, expected utility can be approximated by a judiciously chosen function defined over mean and variance. In addition to resurrecting mean-variance analysis from the limbo into which it was placed by the criticisms of Borch [10] and others, the analysis by Levy and Markowitz yields a more direct approach to portfolio analysis than that provided by the current empirical literature. The current portfolio literature is concerned with notions of efficient sets and systematic risk rather than with utility functions and mean-variance. While much has been gained from a utility-free methodology, it is ultimately predicated upon a separation theorem and, hence, an environment with zero transactions costs. But security markets are not costless and the separation theorem may not hold. In that event, a utility-dependent approach to portfolio analysis could potentially lead to more powerful results especially if such an approach could be empirically implemented.

Suggested Citation

  • Aivazian, Varouj A. & Callen, Jeffrey L. & Krinsky, Itzhak & Kwan, Clarence C. Y., 1983. "Mean-Variance Utility Functions and the Demand for Risky Assets: An Empirical Analysis Using Flexible Functional Forms," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 411-424, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:18:y:1983:i:04:p:411-424_02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000020184/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liang, Jin & Zhao, Yuejuan & Zhang, Xudan, 2016. "Utility indifference valuation of corporate bond with credit rating migration by structure approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 339-346.
    2. Zhehao Huang & Zhenghui Li & Zhenzhen Wang, 2020. "Utility Indifference Valuation for Defaultable Corporate Bond with Credit Rating Migration," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-26, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:18:y:1983:i:04:p:411-424_02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.