IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jfinqa/v15y1980i05p1005-1023_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Orthogonal Portfolios

Author

Listed:
  • Roll, Richard

Abstract

There is a false, but widely-held belief about orthogonal (“zero-beta†) portfolios: for a given market index, all zero-beta portfolios have the same expected return and the minimal-variance, zero-beta portfolio is unique. This is true only when the index is mean/variance efficient. Every nonefficient index possesses zero-beta portfolios at all levels of expected return. For a given index, minimal-variance zero-beta portfolios corresponding to different expected returns lie along an “orthogonal frontier†in the mean/variance space. The frontier has some unusual properties which turn out to be relevant for empirical work on asset pricing. It is functionally related to deviations about the “securities market line.â€

Suggested Citation

  • Roll, Richard, 1980. "Orthogonal Portfolios," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 15(5), pages 1005-1023, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:15:y:1980:i:05:p:1005-1023_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022109000013995/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:wvu:wpaper:05-06 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. G. P. Diacogiannis, 1999. "A three-dimensional risk-return relationship based upon the inefficiency of a portfolio: derivation and implications," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 225-235.
    3. Chavez-Bedoya, Luis & Rosales, Francisco, 2022. "Orthogonal portfolios to assess estimation risk," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 906-937.
    4. MacKinlay, A. Craig, 1995. "Multifactor models do not explain deviations from the CAPM," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 3-28, May.
    5. Nijolė MAKNICKIENĖ & Jelena STANKEVIČIENĖ & Algirdas MAKNICKAS, 2020. "Comparison of Forex Market Forecasting Tools Based on Evolino Ensemble and Technical Analysis Indicators," Journal for Economic Forecasting, Institute for Economic Forecasting, vol. 0(3), pages 134-148, September.
    6. Todd Prono, 2006. "GARCH-based identification of triangular systems with an application to the CAPM: still living with the roll critique," Working Papers 07-1, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
    7. Asgharian, Hossein & Hansson, Bjorn, 2005. "Evaluating the importance of missing risk factors using the optimal orthogonal portfolio approach," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 556-575, September.
    8. A. Craig MacKinlay, 1994. "Multifactor Models Do Not Explain Deviations from the CAPM," NBER Working Papers 4756, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Guermat, Cherif, 2014. "Yes, the CAPM is testable," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 31-42.
    10. Diacogiannis, George & Ioannidis, Christos, 2022. "Linear beta pricing with efficient/inefficient benchmarks and short-selling restrictions," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    11. Chi-Cheng Hsia, 1986. "Comparative Efficiency Of Market Indices: An Empirical Study," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 9(2), pages 123-135, June.
    12. Kolari, James W. & Huang, Jianhua Z. & Butt, Hilal Anwar & Liao, Huiling, 2022. "International tests of the ZCAPM asset pricing model," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jfinqa:v:15:y:1980:i:05:p:1005-1023_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jfq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.