IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jechis/v44y1984i04p1047-1067_03.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supply-Side Shocks: The Case of Australian Gold

Author

Listed:
  • Maddock, Rodney
  • McLean, Ian

Abstract

A literature has developed recently to analyze the disruptive effects on small, open economies of a sudden change in the value of their natural resources. The paper looks to that literature to explain the effect on the Australian colonies of the discovery of substantial gold deposits in the 1850s. The price and quantity adjustments predicted by the model are found to be well supported by the historical experience with one important exception. Immigration played a far greater role in the Australian case than has been suggested in the theoretical literature. The model does, however, allow for a compact description of the confusing decade in Australian history and explains a number of previously unconnected phenomena.

Suggested Citation

  • Maddock, Rodney & McLean, Ian, 1984. "Supply-Side Shocks: The Case of Australian Gold," The Journal of Economic History, Cambridge University Press, vol. 44(4), pages 1047-1067, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:44:y:1984:i:04:p:1047-1067_03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022050700033088/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephen Broadberry & Douglas A. Irwin, 2007. "Lost Exceptionalism? Comparative Income and Productivity in Australia and the UK, 1861–1948," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 83(262), pages 262-274, September.
    2. Keir Reeves, 2010. "Sojourners Or A New Diaspora? Economic Implications Of The Movement Of Chinese Miners To The South‐West Pacific Goldfields," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(2), pages 178-192, July.
    3. Celal Bayari, 2016. "Economic Geography of the Australian Mining Industry," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 107(5), pages 552-566, December.
    4. K.H. Choi, 1988. "The Economics of Booming Sectors," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 88-04, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    5. Robert G Gregory, 2012. "Living standards, terms of trade and foreign ownership: reflections on the Australian mining boom," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(2), pages 171-200, April.
    6. Marek Szturo & Bogdan Włodarczyk & Alberto Burchi & Ireneusz Miciuła & Karolina Szturo, 2021. "Improving Relations between a State and a Business Enterprise in the Context of Counteracting Adverse Effects of the Resource Curse," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, January.
    7. Anderson, Kym, 2016. "Sectoral Trends and Shocks in Australia’s Economic Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 11598, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    8. Kym Anderson, 2018. "Mining’s impact on the competitiveness of other sectors in a resource-rich economy: Australia since the 1840s," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 31(1), pages 141-151, May.
    9. Gerlach, Stefan & Stuart, Rebecca, 2021. "International Co-movements of Inflation, 1851-1913," CEPR Discussion Papers 15914, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Edwyna Harris & Sumner La Croix, 2021. "Australia’s Forgotten Copper Mining Boom: Understanding How South Australia Avoided Dutch Disease, 1843–1850," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 97(318), pages 424-439, September.
    11. McLean, Ian W., 2007. "Why was Australia so rich?," Explorations in Economic History, Elsevier, vol. 44(4), pages 635-656, October.
    12. Ådne Cappelen & Torbjørn Eika, 2020. "Immigration and the Dutch disease A counterfactual analysis of the Norwegian resource boom 2004-2013," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 669-690, July.
    13. Jean-Philippe Stijns, 2003. "An Empirical Test of the Dutch Disease Hypothesis using a Gravity Model of Trade," International Trade 0305001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Qiang, Ye, 1999. "How different is mining from mineral processing? A general equilibrium analysis of new resources projects in Western Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(3), pages 1-26, September.
    15. Keir Reeves & Lionel Frost & Charles Fahey, 2010. "Integrating The Historiography Of The Nineteenth‐Century Gold Rushes," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 50(2), pages 111-128, July.
    16. Grant Mark Nülle & Graham A. Davis, 2018. "Neither Dutch nor disease?—natural resource booms in theory and empirics," Mineral Economics, Springer;Raw Materials Group (RMG);Luleå University of Technology, vol. 31(1), pages 35-59, May.
    17. Nowak, Jean-Jacques, 1995. "Le syndrome néerlandais : relations intersectorielles et vulnérabilité des branches exposées," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 71(3), pages 308-333, septembre.
    18. repec:ags:aare16:235308 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Dmytro Ostapenko, 2014. "‘Does Farming Pay in Victoria?’ Profit Potential of the Farming Industry in Mid-Nineteenth-Century Victoria," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 54(1), pages 37-61, March.
    20. Kym Anderson, 2022. "Structural transformation in growing open economies: Australia’s experience," Departmental Working Papers 2022-13, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    21. David Greasley & Jakob B. Madsen, 2017. "The Rise and Fall of Exceptional Australian Incomes Since 1800," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(3), pages 264-290, November.
    22. Kym Anderson, 2023. "Why did agriculture’s share of Australian GDP not decline for a century?," Departmental Working Papers 2023-09, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    23. Kym Anderson, 2017. "Sectoral Trends and Shocks in Australia's Economic Growth," Australian Economic History Review, Economic History Society of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 57(1), pages 2-21, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jechis:v:44:y:1984:i:04:p:1047-1067_03. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jeh .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.