This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Dirty Pool

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Green, Donald P.
Kim, Soo Yeon H.
Yoon, David
Abstract

The quantitative study of international relations is dominated byanalyses of pooled cross-sections. When analyzing dependent variables,such as the occurrence of a militarized dispute or the level of tradebetween two nations, researchers tend to work with panel data sets ofNTobservations, where N is the number of dyads (pairs of nations) and T isthe number of time points (typically years). Thus, for example, whensixty nations are observed annually over the span of forty years, thepooled cross-sectional data set consists of 1,770 dyads [times] forty years =70,800 observations. These data are said to be pooled in that nodistinction is made between observations in time and space. A datum is adatum, and one can draw inferences with equal certitude across dyads oracross years.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0020818301441385
File Format: text/html
File Function: link to article abstract page
Download Restriction: no

Publisher Info
Article provided by Cambridge University Press in its journal International Organization.

Volume (Year): 55 (2001)
Issue (Month): 02 (April)
Pages: 441-468
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:cup:intorg:v:55:y:2001:i:02:p:441-468_44

Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK
Fax: +44 (0)1223 325150
Email:
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_INO

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: (Mike Eden).

Related research
Keywords:

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. John Robst & Solomon Polachek & Yuan-Ching Chang, 2006. "Geographic Proximity, Trade and International Conflict/Cooperation," IZA Discussion Papers 1988, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA). [Downloadable!]
  2. Acemoglu, Daron & Johnson, Simon & Robinson, James A & Yared, Pierre, 2007. "Reevaluating the Modernization Hypothesis," CEPR Discussion Papers 6430, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
    Other versions:
  3. Erik Lundsgaarde & Christian Breunig & Aseem Prakash, 2007. "Trade versus aid: donor generosity in an era of globalization," Policy Sciences, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 157-179, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  4. Dreher, Axel & Sturm, Jan-Egbert & Vreeland, James Raymond, 2007. "Does membership on the UN Security Council influence IMF decisions? Evidence from panel data," Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Göttingen 2007 4, Verein für Socialpolitik, Research Committee Development Economics. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  5. Bruno Amable & Donatella Gatti & Elvire Guillaud, 2008. "How does party fractionalization convey preferences for redistribution in parliamentary democracies?," PSE Working Papers 2008-42, PSE (Ecole normale supérieure). [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc stands for Research Papers in Economics.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-18.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.