IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v34y2018i05p1101-1131_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Directionally Differentiable Econometric Models

Author

Listed:
  • Cho, Jin Seo
  • White, Halbert

Abstract

The current article examines the limit distribution of the quasi-maximum likelihood estimator obtained from a directionally differentiable quasi-likelihood function and represents its limit distribution as a functional of a Gaussian stochastic process indexed by direction. In this way, the standard analysis that assumes a differentiable quasi-likelihood function is treated as a special case of our analysis. We also examine and redefine the standard quasi-likelihood ratio, Wald, and Lagrange multiplier test statistics so that their null limit behaviors are regular under our model framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Cho, Jin Seo & White, Halbert, 2018. "Directionally Differentiable Econometric Models," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(5), pages 1101-1131, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:34:y:2018:i:05:p:1101-1131_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0266466617000354/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin Seo Cho & Isao Ishida & Halbert White, 2013. "Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity Using Twofold Unidentified Models under the Null and Hexic Expansions (published in: Essays in Nonlinear Time Series Econometrics, Festschrift in Honor of Timo Teras," Working papers 2013rwp-55, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    2. Baek, Yae In & Cho, Jin Seo & Phillips, Peter C.B., 2015. "Testing linearity using power transforms of regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 376-384.
    3. Cho, Jin Seo & White, Halbert, 2010. "Testing for unobserved heterogeneity in exponential and Weibull duration models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 458-480, August.
    4. Cho, Jin Seo & White, Halbert, 2011. "Generalized runs tests for the IID hypothesis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 326-344, June.
    5. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. & White, Halbert, 1988. "Some Invariance Principles and Central Limit Theorems for Dependent Heterogeneous Processes," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 210-230, August.
    6. King, Maxwell L & Shively, Thomas S, 1993. "Locally Optimal Testing When a Nuisance Parameter Is Present Only under the Alternative," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 75(1), pages 1-7, February.
    7. Pollard, David, 1985. "New Ways to Prove Central Limit Theorems," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(3), pages 295-313, December.
    8. Jin Seo Cho & Halbert White, 2007. "Testing for Regime Switching," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 75(6), pages 1671-1720, November.
    9. Jin Seo Cho & Halbert White, 2017. "Supplements to "Directionally Differentiable Econometric Models"," Working papers 2017rwp-103a, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    10. Stevenson, Rodney E., 1980. "Likelihood functions for generalized stochastic frontier estimation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 57-66, May.
    11. Donald W. K. Andrews, 1999. "Estimation When a Parameter Is on a Boundary," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 67(6), pages 1341-1384, November.
    12. Cho, Jin Seo & Ishida, Isao, 2012. "Testing for the effects of omitted power transformations," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 117(1), pages 287-290.
    13. Andrews, Donald W K, 2001. "Testing When a Parameter Is on the Boundary of the Maintained Hypothesis," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 69(3), pages 683-734, May.
    14. Aigner, Dennis & Lovell, C. A. Knox & Schmidt, Peter, 1977. "Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 21-37, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Jansson & Demian Pouzo, 2017. "Towards a General Large Sample Theory for Regularized Estimators," Papers 1712.07248, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2020.
    2. Firpo, Sergio & Galvao, Antonio F. & Parker, Thomas, 2023. "Uniform inference for value functions," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 235(2), pages 1680-1699.
    3. Sergio Firpo & Antonio F. Galvao & Martyna Kobus & Thomas Parker & Pedro Rosa-Dias, 2020. "Loss aversion and the welfare ranking of policy interventions," Papers 2004.08468, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    4. Jin Seo Cho & Halbert White, 2017. "Supplements to "Directionally Differentiable Econometric Models"," Working papers 2017rwp-103a, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    5. Dakyung Seong & Jin Seo Cho & Timo Terasvirta, 2019. "Comprehensive Testing of Linearity against the Smooth Transition Autoregressive Model," Working papers 2019rwp-151, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Seo Cho & Jin Seok Park & Sang Woo Park, 2018. "Testing for the Conditional Geometric Mixture Distribution," Working papers 2018rwp-123, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    2. Jin Seo Cho & Peter C. B. Phillips & Juwon Seo, 2019. "Parametric Inference on the Mean of Functional Data Applied to Lifetime Income Curves," Working papers 2019rwp-153, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    3. Dakyung Seong & Jin Seo Cho & Timo Teräsvirta, 2019. "Comprehensive Testing of Linearity against the Smooth Transition Autoregressive Model," CREATES Research Papers 2019-17, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    4. Jin Seo Cho & Matthew Greenwood‐Nimmo & Yongcheol Shin, 2023. "Recent developments of the autoregressive distributed lag modelling framework," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(1), pages 7-32, February.
    5. Jin Seo Cho & Peter C. B. Phillips, 2018. "Sequentially testing polynomial model hypotheses using power transforms of regressors," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 141-159, January.
    6. Jin Seo Cho & Peter C. B. Phillips & Juwon Seo, 2022. "Parametric Conditional Mean Inference With Functional Data Applied To Lifetime Income Curves," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 63(1), pages 391-456, February.
    7. Kyu Lee Shin & Jin Seo Cho, 2013. "Testing for Neglected Nonlinearity Using Extreme Learning Machines (published in: International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 21, Suppl. 2 (2013), 117--129.)," Working papers 2013rwp-57, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    8. Donald W. K. Andrews & Xu Cheng, 2012. "Estimation and Inference With Weak, Semi‐Strong, and Strong Identification," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(5), pages 2153-2211, September.
    9. Centorrino, Samuele & Pérez-Urdiales, María, 2023. "Maximum likelihood estimation of stochastic frontier models with endogeneity," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 82-105.
    10. Yae Ji Jun & Jin Seo Cho, 2015. "Analyzing the Interrelationship of the Statistics for Testing Neglected Nonlinearity under the Null of Linearity," Working papers 2015rwp-78, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    11. Ketz, Philipp, 2018. "Subvector inference when the true parameter vector may be near or at the boundary," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 285-306.
    12. Baek, Yae In & Cho, Jin Seo & Phillips, Peter C.B., 2015. "Testing linearity using power transforms of regressors," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 187(1), pages 376-384.
    13. Jin Seo Cho & Halbert White, 2017. "Supplements to "Directionally Differentiable Econometric Models"," Working papers 2017rwp-103a, Yonsei University, Yonsei Economics Research Institute.
    14. Centorrino, Samuele & Perez Urdiales, Mari­a & Bravo-Ureta, Boris & Wall, Alan, 2021. "Binary Endogenous Treatment in Stochastic Frontier Models with an Application to Soil Conservation in El Salvador," 95th Annual Conference, March 29-30, 2021, Warwick, UK (Hybrid) 312058, Agricultural Economics Society - AES.
    15. Meitz, Mika & Saikkonen, Pentti, 2021. "Testing for observation-dependent regime switching in mixture autoregressive models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 601-624.
    16. Cho, Jin Seo & White, Halbert, 2010. "Testing for unobserved heterogeneity in exponential and Weibull duration models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 458-480, August.
    17. Bera Anil K. & Doğan Osman & Bilias Yannis & Yoon Mann J. & Taşpınar Süleyman, 2020. "Adjustments of Rao’s Score Test for Distributional and Local Parametric Misspecifications," Journal of Econometric Methods, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-29, January.
    18. Kumbhakar, Subal C. & Parmeter, Christopher F. & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2013. "A zero inefficiency stochastic frontier model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 66-76.
    19. Hasan, Iftekhar & Lozano-Vivas, Ana, 2002. "Organizational Form and Expense Preference: Spanish Experience," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 135-150, April.
    20. Rossi, Martín, 2000. "Análisis de eficiencia aplicado a la regulación ¿Es importante la Distribución Elegida para el Término de Ineficiencia?," UADE Textos de Discusión 22_2000, Instituto de Economía, Universidad Argentina de la Empresa.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C22 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes
    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:34:y:2018:i:05:p:1101-1131_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.