IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/etheor/v21y2005i06p1058-1086_05.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bivariate Arch Models: Finite-Sample Properties Of Qml Estimators And An Application To An Lm-Type Test

Author

Listed:
  • Iglesias, Emma M.
  • Phillips, Garry D.A.

Abstract

This paper provides two main new results: the first shows theoretically that large biases and variances can arise when the quasi-maximum likelihood (QML) estimation method is employed in a simple bivariate structure under the assumption of conditional heteroskedasticity; and the second demonstrates how these analytical theoretical results can be used to improve the finite-sample performance of a test for multivariate autoregressive conditional heteroskedastic (ARCH) effects, suggesting an alternative to a traditional Bartlett-type correction. We analyze two models: one proposed in Wong and Li (1997, Biometrika 84, 111–123) and another proposed by Engle and Kroner (1995, Econometric Theory 11, 122–150) and Liu and Polasek (1999, Modelling and Decisions in Economics; 2000, working paper, University of Basel). We prove theoretically that a relatively large difference between the intercepts in the two conditional variance equations, which leads to the two series having correspondingly different volatilities in the restricted case, may produce very large variances in some QML estimators in the first model and very severe biases in some QML estimators in the second. Later we use our bias expressions to propose an LM-type test of multivariate ARCH effects and show through simulations that small-sample improvements are possible, especially in relation to the size, when we bias correct the estimators and use the expected hessian version of the test.Both authors thank H. Wong for providing us with the Gauss program to simulate the Wong and Li (1997) model. We also thank three anonymous referees for extremely helpful comments, and we are grateful for the comments received at seminars given at Cardiff University, Michigan State University, Queen Mary London, University of Exeter, and University of Montreal. We acknowledge gratefully also the financial support from an ESRC grant (award number T026 27 1238). A previous version of this paper appeared as IVIE Working paper 2004-09.

Suggested Citation

  • Iglesias, Emma M. & Phillips, Garry D.A., 2005. "Bivariate Arch Models: Finite-Sample Properties Of Qml Estimators And An Application To An Lm-Type Test," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(6), pages 1058-1086, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:21:y:2005:i:06:p:1058-1086_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S026646660505053X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chambers, Marcus J., 2013. "Jackknife estimation of stationary autoregressive models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 172(1), pages 142-157.
    2. Iglesias, Emma M., 2014. "Testing of the mean reversion parameter in continuous time models," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 187-189.
    3. Maixé-Altés, J. Carles & Iglesias, Emma M., 2009. "Domestic monetary transfers and the inland bill of exchange markets in Spain (1775-1885)," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 496-521, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:etheor:v:21:y:2005:i:06:p:1058-1086_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ect .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.