Conditional Inference For Possibly Unidentified Structural Equations
AbstractThe possibility that a structural equation may not be identified casts doubt on measures of estimator precision that are usually used. Using the Fieller Creasy problem for illustration, we argue that an observed identifiability test statistic is directly relevant to the precision with which the structural parameters can be estimated, and hence we argue that inference in such models should be conditioned on the observed value of that statistic (or statistics).We examine in detail the effects of such conditioning on the properties of the ordinary least squares (OLS) and two-stage least squares (TSLS) estimators for the coefficients of the endogenous variables in a single structural equation. We show that (a) conditioning has very little impact on the properties of the OLS estimator but a substantial impact on those of the TSLS estimator; (b) the conditional variance of the TSLS estimator can be very much larger than its unconditional variance (when the identifiability statistic is small) or very much smaller (when the identifiability statistic is large); and (c) conditional mean-square-error comparisons of the two estimators favor the OLS estimator when the sample evidence only weakly supports the identifiability hypothesis but favor TSLS when that evidence moderately supports identifiability.Finally, we note that another consequence of our argument is that the statistic upon which Anderson Rubin confidence sets are based is in fact nonpivotal.We are grateful for the constructive comments offered by Peter Phillips and three anonymous referees that greatly improved the paper. Giovanni Forchini acknowledges support from ESRC grant NR00429424115.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Cambridge University Press in its journal Econometric Theory.
Volume (Year): 19 (2003)
Issue (Month): 05 (October)
Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK
Fax: +44 (0)1223 325150
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_ECTProvider-Email:firstname.lastname@example.org
Other versions of this item:
- Forchini, G. & Hillier, G.H., 1999. "Conditional inference for possibly unidentified structural equations," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 9906, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Sims, Christopher A, 1980. "Macroeconomics and Reality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 48(1), pages 1-48, January.
- John Chao & Norman Swanson, 2003.
"Alternative Approximations of the Bias and MSE of the IV Estimator Under Weak Identification With an Application to Bias Correction,"
Departmental Working Papers
200315, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
- Chao, John & Swanson, Norman R., 2007. "Alternative approximations of the bias and MSE of the IV estimator under weak identification with an application to bias correction," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 137(2), pages 515-555, April.
- John Chao & Norman R. Swanson, 2003. "Alternative Approximations of the Bias and MSE of the IV Estimator under Weak Identification with an Application to Bias Correction," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1418, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- John C. Chao & Norman Rasmus Swanson, 2004. "Alternative Approximations of the Bias and MSE of the IV Estimator Under Weak Identification with an Application to Bias Correction," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm375, Yale School of Management.
- Peter C.B. Phillips, 2003.
"Vision and Influence in Econometrics: John Denis Sargan,"
Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers
1393, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Phillips, Peter C.B., 2003. "Vision And Influence In Econometrics: John Denis Sargan," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(03), pages 495-511, June.
- Grant Hillier & Giovanni Forchini, 2004. "Ill-posed Problems and Instruments' Weakness," Econometric Society 2004 Australasian Meetings 357, Econometric Society.
- Russell Davidson & James G. MacKinnon, 2011. "Confidence Sets Based on Inverting Anderson-Rubin Tests," Working Papers 1257, Queen's University, Department of Economics.
- Kleibergen, F.R. & Zivot, E., 1998.
"Bayesian and classical approaches to instrumental variable regression,"
Econometric Institute Report
EI 9835, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Econometric Institute.
- Kleibergen, Frank & Zivot, Eric, 2003. "Bayesian and classical approaches to instrumental variable regression," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 29-72, May.
- Frank Kleibergen & Eric Zivot, 1998. "Bayesian and Classical Approaches to Instrumental Variables Regression," Econometrics 9812002, EconWPA.
- Frank Kleibergen & Eric Zivot, 2003. "Bayesian and Classical Approaches to Instrumental Variable Regression," Working Papers UWEC-2002-21-P, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
- Frank Kleibergen & Eric Zivot, 1998. "Bayesian and Classical Approaches to Instrumental Variable Regression," Working Papers 0063, University of Washington, Department of Economics.
- Frank Kleibergen & Eric Zivot, 1998. "Bayesian and Classical Approaches to Instrumental Variable Regression," Discussion Papers in Economics at the University of Washington 0063, Department of Economics at the University of Washington.
- D.S. Poskitt & C.L. Skeels, 2002. "Assessing Instrumental Variable Relevance:An Alternative Measure and Some Exact Finite Sample Theory," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 862, The University of Melbourne.
- Peter C. B. Phillips, 2003.
"Laws and Limits of Econometrics,"
Royal Economic Society, vol. 113(486), pages C26-C52, March.
- Giovanni Forchini, 2005.
"On the Bimodality of the Exact Distribution of the TSLS Estimator,"
Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers
14/05, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
- Forchini, G., 2006. "On The Bimodality Of The Exact Distribution Of The Tsls Estimator," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(05), pages 932-946, October.
- Dufour, Jean-Marie & Taamouti, Mohamed, 2007. "Further results on projection-based inference in IV regressions with weak, collinear or missing instruments," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 139(1), pages 133-153, July.
- Poskitt, D.S. & Skeels, C.L., 2008.
"Conceptual frameworks and experimental design in simultaneous equations,"
Elsevier, vol. 100(1), pages 138-142, July.
- C.L. Skeels, 2007. "Conceptual Frameworks and Experimental Design in Simultaneous Equations," Department of Economics - Working Papers Series 1020, The University of Melbourne.
- Adrian Pagan, 2007. "Weak Instruments: A Guide to the Literature," NCER Working Paper Series 13, National Centre for Econometric Research.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.