Framing as Path Dependence
AbstractA framing effect occurs when an agent s choices are not invariant under changes in the way a decision problem is presented, e.g. changes in the way options are described (violation of description invariance) or preferences are elicited (violation of procedure invariance). Here we identify those rationality violations that underlie framing effects. We attribute to the agent a sequential decision process in which a target proposition and several background propositions are considered. We suggest that the agent exhibits a framing effect if and only if two conditions are met. First, different presentations of the decision problem lead the agent to consider the propositions in a different order (the empirical condition). Second, different such decision paths lead to different decisions on the target proposition (the logical condition). The second condition holds when the agent s initial dispositions on the propositions are implicitly inconsistent, which may be caused by violations of deductive closure. Our account is consistent with some observations made by psychologists and provides a unified framework for explaining violations of description and procedure invariance.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Cambridge University Press in its journal Economics and Philosophy.
Volume (Year): 20 (2004)
Issue (Month): 02 (October)
Contact details of provider:
Postal: The Edinburgh Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU UK
Fax: +44 (0)1223 325150
Web page: http://journals.cambridge.org/jid_EAPProvider-Email:email@example.com
Other versions of this item:
- D11 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Theory
- D80 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - General
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde & Raphaël Giraud, 2009.
"Framing effects as violations of extensionality,"
Theory and Decision,
Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 385-404, October.
- repec:hal:wpaper:ijn_00000656 is not listed on IDEAS
- repec:hal:cesptp:ijn_00000656 is not listed on IDEAS
- Dietrich Franz & List Christian, 2011.
"Where do preferences come from?,"
005, Maastricht University, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization (METEOR).
- Whynes, David K. & Frew, Emma J. & Philips, Zoe N. & Covey, Judith & Smith, Richard D., 2007. "On the numerical forms of contingent valuation responses," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 462-476, August.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Keith Waters).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.