IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cto/journl/v2y1982i2p619-635.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compulsory Unionism and the Free-Rider Doctrine

Author

Listed:
  • John C. Moorhouse Author-Email:

    (Wake Forest University)

Abstract

Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 provides that a union, established by a majority vote of the employees in a bargaining unit, must accord all employees in the unit the benefits of union representation. Many students of the American union move- ment interpret this legal obligation as potentially threatening union security because ofthe free-rider phenomenon. Typically, they argue that since an employee receives union benefits regardless of his membership status, economic self-inter~stwill lead him to accept the benefits without incurring the pecuniary and non-pecuniary costs of joining and supporting the union. The employee becomes a free rider...

Suggested Citation

  • John C. Moorhouse Author-Email:, 1982. "Compulsory Unionism and the Free-Rider Doctrine," Cato Journal, Cato Journal, Cato Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 619-635, Fall.
  • Handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:2:y:1982:i:2:p:619-635
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/cato-journal/1982/12/cj2n2-13.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cto:journl:v:2:y:1982:i:2:p:619-635. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emily Ekins (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/catoous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.