Collection Conditions and Self-Rated Health: An Analysis of European Data
AbstractSelf-rated health is only a biased reflection of real health. However, it is difficult to isolate and assess this bias. In particular, to what extent does the information collected depended on the collection conditions, given that these vary considerably between countries and surveys? The resources in the Share database enable us to analyse two collection method effects: the position of the subjective health question in the questionnaire and the wording of the suggested response modalities. Both effects have an impact: the average level of health, the distribution of states of health and links between health and other variables are altered when the collection conditions change. The positioning effect is homogenous within all countries. The wording of the suggested response modalities also changes the measure of self-rated health. For example, Sweden appears to be the healthiest country using the initial wording, but moves down to fifth place using a second wording.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques in its journal Economie et Statistique.
Volume (Year): 403-404 (2007)
Issue (Month): (December)
Self-Reported Health; Framing Effects; International Health Rankings;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- C81 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology; Computer Programs - - - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data; Data Access
- I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Crossley, Thomas F. & Kennedy, Steven, 2002. "The reliability of self-assessed health status," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 643-658, July.
- Paul Dourgnon & Salim Lardjane, 2007.
"Les comparaisons internationales d'état de santé subjectif sont-elles pertinentes ? Une évaluation par la méthode des vignettes-étalons,"
Économie et Statistique,
Programme National Persée, vol. 403(1), pages 165-177.
- Salim Lardjane & Paul Dourgnon, 2007. "Les comparaisons internationales d'etat de sante subjectif sont-elles pertinentes ? Une evaluation par la methode des vignettes-etalon," Working Papers DT2, IRDES institut for research and information in health economics, revised Feb 2007.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (D3E).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.