Socio-Professional and Educational Homogamy: Situation and Evolution Across Marriage Cohorts
AbstractIn 1999, close to one in three couples were composed of two people sharing the same social status; this is two times greater than if the couples had been formed at random. When the changes to the socio-professional structure are taken into account, the evolution of homogamy remains uncertain: it is difficult to say whether men and women today form relationships with a partner of the same socio-professional category more or less often than in the past. Within the majority of couples the partners also have identical levels of education. However, the proportion of couples composed of two people with the same level of education is lower for recent marriages than for those formed during the 1950s. This evolution results in part from changes in education, and in particular to the rise in the level of education. Independently from this structural effect, there has been a downward trend in educational homogamy.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques in its journal Economie et Statistique.
Volume (Year): 398-399 (2007)
Issue (Month): (March)
Homogamy; Union; Socio-Professional; Education; Level of Education;
Find related papers by JEL classification:
- J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
- J12 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Marriage; Marital Dissolution; Family Structure
You can help add them by filling out this form.
reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.Access and download statisticsgeneral information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (D3E).
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.