IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v6y1980i4p574-583.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact on the Quebec Economy of a Disruption of Trade Relations between Quebec and Its Major Trading Partners

Author

Listed:
  • A. Anastasopoulos
  • L. Brault
  • William A. Sims

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • A. Anastasopoulos & L. Brault & William A. Sims, 1980. "The Impact on the Quebec Economy of a Disruption of Trade Relations between Quebec and Its Major Trading Partners," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 6(4), pages 574-583, Autumn.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:6:y:1980:i:4:p:574-583
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28198023%296%3A4%3C574%3ATIOTQE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-8
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robin W. Boadway & John M. Treddenick, 1978. "A General Equilibrium Computation of the Effects of the Canadian Tariff Structure," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 11(3), pages 424-446, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lawrence H. Goulder & John B. Shoven & John Whalley, 1982. "Domestic Tax Policy and the Foreign Sector: The Importance of Alternative Foreign Sector Formulations to Results from a General Equilibrium," NBER Working Papers 0919, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Hazledine, Tim, 1980. "A Non-Neoclassical General Equilibrium Trade Model Implemented for Quebec," Queen's Institute for Economic Research Discussion Papers 275159, Queen's University - Department of Economics.
    3. Hazledine, Tim, 1989. "Industrial Organisation Foundations Of Trade Policy Modelling," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 33(1), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Arvind Panagariya, 2003. "Alternative Approaches to Measuring the Cost of Protection," International Trade 0308002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Séguin-Dulude, Louise, 1979. "Analyse de la politique commerciale canadienne : rétrospective et synthèse," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 55(3), pages 303-341, juillet.
    6. Coyle, Barry & Chambers, Robert G. & Schmitz, Andrew, 1986. "Economic Gains from Agricultural Trade: A Review and Bibliography," Miscellaneous Publications 319990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Edward E. Leamer, 1992. "Testing Trade Theory," NBER Working Papers 3957, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Glenn Jenkins, 1985. "Costs And Consequences Of The New Protectionism: The Case Of Canada’S Clothing Sector," Development Discussion Papers 1985-04, JDI Executive Programs.
    9. Carlos E. Zarazaga, 1999. "Measuring the benefits of unilateral trade liberalization, Part I: static models," Economic and Financial Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, issue Q III, pages 14-25.
    10. Boeters, Stefan & Savard, Luc, 2013. "The Labor Market in Computable General Equilibrium Models," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1645-1718, Elsevier.
    11. Ruocco, Anna, 1995. "Savings and investment fiscal policies: A quantitative analysis for the Italian economy," Tübinger Diskussionsbeiträge 49, University of Tübingen, School of Business and Economics.
    12. Guilhoto, Joaquim José Martins & Hasegawa, Marcos & Lopes, Ricardo Luis, 2002. "A estrutura teórica do modelo inter-regional para a economia brasileira - MIBRA [The theoretical structure of inter regional model for the Brazilian economy - MIBRA]," MPRA Paper 54019, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. William G. Watson, 1988. "The Case of the Disputed Benefit: A Reply to Tim Hazledine," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 14(2), pages 214-221, June.
    14. James A. Brander, 1989. "Election Polls, Free Trade, and the Stock Market: Evidence from the Canadian General Election," NBER Working Papers 3073, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:6:y:1980:i:4:p:574-583. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.